Well, that's some comfort perhaps.
Observation data has the highest impact at t+6 hours (end of assimilation period) and that gradually falls as the run progresses, so in theory it's the short-term output that is less trustworthy than usual.
Whether we see a backtrack towards more of an easterly influence next week or not, there are other interesting things going on in the output. First, there are signs of weak disturbances in the northerly flow on Sunday that could at least bring periods of snow showers (in fact the Met Office have a wavy occluded front - cloudy with sporadic snow?).
Second, we see signals for the PV to start travelling out of Canada before it's even had a chance to settle down, which suggests that we're unlikely to lock into a bog-standard +ve NAO pattern, with that as more of a transition period after which the pattern re-amplifies as the strat. developments start to show their worth. I think the GFS 12z later FI is a fairly good attempt at representing this pattern. The GFSP 12z is going along alright until the final few days, when a huge storm bombs out toward Canada for no good reason - just a fluke of the model I suspect (it has produced a huge number of bombing lows in lower-res these past two months, which generally never verify, though it wasn't too far off with the huge storm to our NW earlier this month).
Certainly the sort of situation where any downgrades in the jet strength could significantly reduce the period spent with a flatter pattern. A lot of changes needed for the westerly burst to undercut our mid-latitude high though... that was the best possible route to take us toward the period of strat.-driven polar vortex disruption a little way into January, but it appears that yet again we just aren't lucky enough.
Unless those data shortages are having a serious impact on the modelling of the ridge across Scandinavia, that is... cast your bets
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser