Remove ads from site

JoeShmoe99
12 January 2016 16:41:00
One of the UKMO and GFS is very very wrong and neither is backing down or moving toward the other ... Fascinating to see which one ends up being right (and trying to understand why)
Rob K
12 January 2016 16:41:20
http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/geose_cartes.php 

Yateley, NE Hampshire, 73m asl
"But who wants to be foretold the weather? It is bad enough when it comes, without our having the misery of knowing about it beforehand." β€” Jerome K. Jerome
Gooner
12 January 2016 16:41:28

So far the UKMO is the only one showing any sign of longer range potential... GFS and GEM are about as dire as you can get by 180.

Originally Posted by: Rob K 


Rob, themassive block to the NE cannot be ignored


 


V


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Shropshire
12 January 2016 16:42:39

I just think this is one of those occasions where the UKMO is completely wrong in developing the ridge there, this is two GFS runs in a row where it has developed ridge ahead of the approaching system. 


Historically the second system will bring the milder air and everything is heading NE, I'm sure the ECM will support the GFS, perhaps with a slower evolution to Atlantic control.


From December 27th 2020, zonality will be banned from mixing with the UK. We appreciate that this may come as a shock to younger people and old Uncle Barty. This ban will last for a minimum of ten days.
warrenb
12 January 2016 16:48:56
But again, looking at the NH view of GFS it is completely different to the 6z run. For our bit of the world it has the same outcome, but elsewhere it is completely different.
Gooner
12 January 2016 16:49:04

The 120 fax tonight will certainly answer a few questions


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Gooner
12 January 2016 16:51:42


Block to the NE edges ever closer


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Bertwhistle
12 January 2016 16:51:58

http://www.theweatheroutlook.com/twodata/chart.aspx?chart=/charts/gfs/12_138_mslp850.png?cb=360


 


Is the Atlantic part of this chart not similar to 3 years previous to the very day? (I get the Euro part isn't: no high in the same place). It's that trough moving in against the -5 uppers.


Can't get the wetterzentrale historic chart up to compare- sorry. They've changed their front page.


Bertie, Itchen Valley.
Retire while you can still press the 'retire now' button.
warrenb
12 January 2016 16:52:07
French Arpege short range also going with Meto.
The Beast from the East
12 January 2016 16:52:11


I just think this is one of those occasions where the UKMO is completely wrong in developing the ridge there, this is two GFS runs in a row where it has developed ridge ahead of the approaching system. 


Historically the second system will bring the milder air and everything is heading NE, I'm sure the ECM will support the GFS, perhaps with a slower evolution to Atlantic control.


Originally Posted by: Shropshire 


I agree. UKMO has no support from any other model. At best it just delays the inevitable. The latest METO forecast is a carbon copy of GFS. Mild at wet by midweek.


"We have some alternative facts for you"
Kelly-Ann Conway - special adviser to the President
Russwirral
12 January 2016 16:53:49


http://www.theweatheroutlook.com/twodata/chart.aspx?chart=/charts/gfs/12_138_mslp850.png?cb=360


 


Is the Atlantic part of this chart not similar to 3 years previous to the very day? (I get the Euro part isn't: no high in the same place). It's that trough moving in against the -5 uppers.


Can't get the wetterzentrale historic chart up to compare- sorry. They've changed their front page.


Originally Posted by: Bertwhistle 


 


I posted that yesterday.  The charts 3 yrs ago today, is almost identical to the charts for say 4 days time.


 


Incredible similarity.


Tractor Boy
12 January 2016 16:54:16

One of the UKMO and GFS is very very wrong and neither is backing down or moving toward the other ... Fascinating to see which one ends up being right (and trying to understand why)

Originally Posted by: JoeShmoe99 


But I think the GFS has moved toward UKMO. Taking midnight Monday as a baseline, the T+150 chart on the 18z GFS had the 0C isotherm (at 850) across the eastern side of the UK. The T+144 chart on the 0z run had moved it southwest to Devon. Its just clipping Cornwall on the latest T+132 chart.


 


Dave
Farndale, North York Moors
Steve Murr
12 January 2016 16:55:49

One of the UKMO and GFS is very very wrong and neither is backing down or moving toward the other ... Fascinating to see which one ends up being right (and trying to understand why)

Originally Posted by: JoeShmoe99 


 


i think you will find that statement is a fair way off - look at the GFS over the last 3/4 runs its already changed a huge amount - perhaps some choose to ignore that....

Bertwhistle
12 January 2016 16:56:03


 


 


I posted that yesterday.  The charts 3 yrs ago today, is almost identical to the charts for say 4 days time.


 


Incredible similarity.


Originally Posted by: Russwirral 


Apologies Russ; at least we both spotted it! I suppose that today's run still being so similar- worth note.


Bertie, Itchen Valley.
Retire while you can still press the 'retire now' button.
Tim A
12 January 2016 16:57:40
A breakdown by mid next week is highly possible (esp given met office forecast) but GFS has pushed it back from this Saturday a few runs ago and UKMO shows a solution which favours long term cold. So encouraging signs.
Will be looking at least in hope for the models to keep pushing the breakdown back in the next few days and the block to the east becoming stronger.
Tim
NW Leeds
187m asl

Β My PWS 
The Beast from the East
12 January 2016 17:02:34

GFS control so far


http://modeles7.meteociel.fr/modeles/gens/runs/2016011212/gens-0-1-96.png


Can we get an undercut?


"We have some alternative facts for you"
Kelly-Ann Conway - special adviser to the President
Shropshire
12 January 2016 17:02:42


 


 


i think you will find that statement is a fair way off - look at the GFS over the last 3/4 runs its already changed a hufe amount


-


S


Originally Posted by: Steve Murr 


 


We know that it churns out more runs than the other models, but IMO has it performed very well with the handling of the Greenland High this week. It may be being too quick with the Atlantic but I'll wager that the ECM will also have us in +5 uppers by T192 at the latest.


 


 


From December 27th 2020, zonality will be banned from mixing with the UK. We appreciate that this may come as a shock to younger people and old Uncle Barty. This ban will last for a minimum of ten days.
Arcus
12 January 2016 17:04:19


 


 


i think you will find that statement is a fair way off - look at the GFS over the last 3/4 runs its already changed a hufe amount


-


S


Originally Posted by: Steve Murr 


Agreed - the GFS has been dragged from breaking things down by the middle of this week into prolonging the cold for a further 5 days (and that number seems to keep increasing with each run). GFS has already lost the contest in terms of how this cold spell developed, even if things do break down to mildness later next week. 


Ben,
Nr. Easingwold, North Yorkshire
30m asl
nsrobins
12 January 2016 17:08:05


 


Just what I was thinking Rob.


Stunning MetO tonight 


Originally Posted by: Whiteout 


And stunning output in the Star no doubt 😎


Good to see you posting again! 


Another tweak here and there and we could be looking at a stalling snow event. Quite incredible how ukmo has stuck to it's guns and Exeter are backing it, at least through to Tuesday, in its latest update. Fascinating period of NWP poker being played at the moment.


Neil
Fareham, Hampshire 28m ASL (near estuary)
Stormchaser, Member TORRO
Zubzero
12 January 2016 17:09:04


I think I saw a post from Fergie saying that there were signs of HP being to the W/NW of the U.K.


Originally Posted by: Whiteout 


Think that's what the MOGREPS


Had been showing?


As we never get to see much data from any of the meto models .I'm not sure how good the mid term run/ens are? Are they as accurate as the ECM data for example? 


http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/modelling-systems/unified-model/weather-forecasting


 


 

polarwind
12 January 2016 17:09:06


 


 


i think you will find that statement is a fair way off - look at the GFS over the last 3/4 runs its already changed a huge amount - perhaps some choose to ignore that....


Originally Posted by: Steve Murr 

I think so too - but, will it continue to change in the same direction?


 


"The professional standards of science must impose a framework of discipline and at the same time encourage rebellion against it". – Michael Polyani (1962)
"If climate science is sound and accurate, then it should be able to respond effectively to all the points raised…." - Grandad
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts". - Bertrand Russell
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
"A consensus means that everyone agrees to say collectively what no one believes individually.”- Abba Eban, Israeli diplomat
Dave,Derby
Tractor Boy
12 January 2016 17:09:11

 


 


...but I'll wager that the ECM will also have us in +5 uppers by T192 at the latest.


 


Originally Posted by: Shropshire 


It may well do but how does that prove that GFS (or even ECM) is handling the setup better than UKMO 


Dave
Farndale, North York Moors
nsrobins
12 January 2016 17:12:25


GFS control so far


http://modeles7.meteociel.fr/modeles/gens/runs/2016011212/gens-0-1-96.png


Can we get an undercut?


Originally Posted by: The Beast from the East 


And a quick scan of the GEFS suggests there may be a massive switch imminent. It could be a very busy evening in here πŸ˜‰


Neil
Fareham, Hampshire 28m ASL (near estuary)
Stormchaser, Member TORRO
David M Porter
12 January 2016 17:12:40


I just think this is one of those occasions where the UKMO is completely wrong in developing the ridge there, this is two GFS runs in a row where it has developed ridge ahead of the approaching system. 


Historically the second system will bring the milder air and everything is heading NE, I'm sure the ECM will support the GFS, perhaps with a slower evolution to Atlantic control.


Originally Posted by: Shropshire 


Maybe, but a number of people here were saying something similar both earlier today and last night wrt UKMO moving more towards the evolution of recent GFS runs, and as yet it hasn't happened. If anything, the UKMO at T+144 has moved further away from GFS at the same timeframe rather than towards it.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
squish
12 January 2016 17:13:33
An atlantic breakdown may still be the favourite in the GEFS 12z ensembles, but there are a fair few options that are closer to the UKMO solution. A very finely balanced situation.....
D.E.W on Dartmoor. 300m asl

Remove ads from site

Ads