As it's only just been on the right side of marginal, snow depths are disappointing. In the city centre itself, only very favoured surfaces have any sort of cover (quieter parts of pavements have a thin, slushy cover, roads nothing), and looking at traffic webcams outside the M60, there isn't that much even on grass.
Like I said earlier, if it would have been falling onto frozen ground, I reckon we'd have had 15cm+ by now. Instead, it's hard not to think of it as a frustrating waste of a snowfall.
PS - in response to Ian 'Shropshire' Brown, I'm not sure where you get that NW England has had 'so many poor years' in terms of snow. The period from 2009 has been one of the snowiest in all of my 44 years (at least in my neck of the woods) with at least 5/6 snowfalls of >10cm, and another [at least] 6 with a covering of at least 2cm.
It's hardly Cairngorm stuff but, historically, it's a snowy period - and certainly more snowy than most other parts of lowland England.
Originally Posted by: Saint Snow