Baby born from three people's DNA in UK firsthttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-65538866 A slightly misleading headline, as it means 'first time in UK' - the procedure has been carried out elsewhere previously.
I don't have a problem with injection of a third person's DNA to cure mitochondrial disease, any more than, say, with blood transfusions, and it is expected that the functioning mitochondrial DNA would be inherited by this child's offspring in due course so no need to repeat this in every future generation. Here and now, this is great news for the baby's parents.
So is the problem completely sorted? A word of caution from a couple of statements in the article:
-
There has been no word from the teams in Newcastle so it is still uncertain whether the technique was successful. So watch and wait, no problem in principle
-
There is technically a risk of "reversion" where any defective mitochondria that are carried over could gain in number and still result in disease. This is more serious as it is contrary to the expectation of inheritance above, and there is the possibility that defective mitochondrial DNA could be inherited by future generations, so eventually more widely into the population. This possibility really does need careful checks at some considerably later time, and I hope it's not overlooked.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left - Bertrand Russell
Chichester 12m asl