The OPI has correlation of 0.9 with the AO -but how well does the AO relate to Winter CET?
The AO data covers the the period from 1950 to 2014 a total of 64 winters(DJF).Of these 64 winters 24 (37%)) had a +ve sign, 40 (63% ) having an AO - sign.The mean of winter CET's from 1950/51 to 2013/14 was 4.3C.
The correlation between the values of the AO and CET for the whole 64 winters is 0.66.For the smaller sample size of the AO + and AO - correlations are lower figures are AO + ,0.46, AO-,0.48.
If we look at the the below mean/above mean winter CET's and how they relate to AO- and AO + winters we find;
Of the 40 AO - winters 65% had below average CET's,35% above average CET's.
Of the 24 AO + winters 83% had above average CET's, 17% below average CETs.
Finally a brief look at the stronger AO signal winters >1 and <-1 we find the following years.
AO + winters >1 72/73 CET 4.9,88/89 CET 6.5,89/90 CET 6.2,91/92 CET 4.6,92/93 CET 4.7,99/00 CET 5.4,06/07 6.4. The seven years all have above average CET.
AO - winter <-1 52/53 CET 3.5,55/56 CET 2.9,59/60 CET 4.6,62/63 CET -0.3,64/65 CET 3.3,65/66 CET 4.4,68/69 CET3.2,69/70 CET 3.3,76/77 CET 3.3, 77/78 CET 4.1,78/79 CET 1.6,84/85 CET 2.7,85/86 CET 2.9,95/96 CET 3,00/01 CET 4.5,09/10 CET 2.4,12/13 3.8. The CET in these 17 AO years was below average on 88% of occasions.
Maybe the OPI method will prove a better predicter of the AO than predictions of the NAO.It would be interesting if METO were to release figures showing how successful their forecasts of winter NAO have been. Be it NAO or AO forecasts the link with CET is still not very precise with the majority of years having but a weak link.
Originally Posted by: roger63