Just a slight shift toward ECM within the 6 day range by GFSP and that's arguably the most significant development in the whole run, as it leads to a slower toppling of the high and almost allows LP to become entrenched close enough to the east for interesting results.
The trouble for longer term prospects is that the amount of energy heading south from the split jet in the Eastern U.S. is not even close to what ECM and JMA produce, and this lack of a jet flow underneath the mid-Atlantic high means it has nothing to 'stand on' - hence it sinks and then topples.
This preference for having the northern arm of the jet far stronger than the southern arm is something the 'old' GFS is well known for... and has clearly been even more present in that model's last few runs, with the U.S. low still having the SW-NE alignment, setting the output apart from all of the other models.
The question is, are we seeing another classic case here, or are the likes of ECM leading us up the garden path? As I commented on earlier, the professional view over the other side of the Atlantic appears to support idea of classic GFS bias being at play, which is cause for some hope to be had.
It's certainly the simplest explanation for what is a really quite massive difference between the GEFS mean and ECM ensemble mean, the former really pushing low heights across to our N. while the latter shows a prominent mid-Atlantic ridge keeping the low heights in the U.S./Canada sector, even with some suggestion of the low pressure underneath that can work to sustain it for the foreseeable.
So it seems like we should expect GFS and GEFS to back down dramatically in the near future... but as usual, no guarantees I'm afraid
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser