Remove ads from site

Zubzero
21 January 2016 23:11:03

My problem with mid/long range scientific post's is that I read them every winter, and if half of them come true it would be below average


every Winter. 


 


I only take note of the met office forecast's in the mid term as they just forecast what the latest model information point's to in plain English.


Im sure if they wanted they could post the same information in very high detail that most would struggle to understand properly. 

Gooner
21 January 2016 23:17:11


 


To be fair she didn't post in here - it was copied.


Being disparaging is not my aim. In fact after lengthy scrutiny I get the gist of what the author is trying to explain. What I am however is an exponent of sensible English and will criticise anyone who appears to use over-complex terminology when more sensible and widely understandable phrases will suffice. I am a scientist by profession and peer-review countless publications, and if I was presented with a piece like that it would be referred after the first paragraph. Sorry off topic but I have a right to reply (or maybe not).


Originally Posted by: nsrobins 


Without a doubt she is very knowledgeable but I'm sure the 6,000 word essay can been cut back a bit .  Neil you are spot on, sensible English is correct and I'm sure can be used..................her posts are rather hard to follow . Luckily the last sentence explained it all........................why not just post that , as a separate post maybe.


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


SEMerc
21 January 2016 23:23:01

I loved the following bit in Tamara's post. She's in the wrong business. Writing porn novels should be her vocation.


'Frictional torques have now bottomed out, and starting to trend up in recognition of the continuing low frequency Nino signal in the Pacific. This sets the floor limit for relative angular momentum before rising once again'

Andy Woodcock
21 January 2016 23:25:32
While I admire and respect the knowledge of Tamera, Glacier Point, Steve M etc i think they let their obvious wish to see cold, snowy weather cloud their judgement so every week you read that 'broadscale pattern favours cold' or a similar suggestion.

Trouble is the desired outcome is rarely achieved and if all these indicators point to cold how come the MetO doesn't see it?

Over on Netweather the next ice age is always round the corner and I guess I have seen too many 'internet era' let downs to be taken in by it anymore.

My expectations for the rest of winter is close to zero so anything else is a bonus, this approach worked last week when a 8cms snowfall popped up out of nowhere on Saturday afternoon, but I am convinced winter 2016 will pass without a proper spell of wintry weather across the UK.

Andy (aka Victor Meldrew)
Andy Woodcock
Penrith
Cumbria

Altitude 535 feet

"Why are the British so worried about climate change? Any change to their climate can only be an improvement" John Daley 2001
Solar Cycles
21 January 2016 23:28:54

While I admire and respect the knowledge of Tamera, Glacier Point, Steve M etc i think they let their obvious wish to see cold, snowy weather cloud their judgement so every week you read that 'broadscale pattern favours cold' or a similar suggestion.

Trouble is the desired outcome is rarely achieved and if all these indicators point to cold how come the MetO doesn't see it?

Over on Netweather the next ice age is always round the corner and I guess I have seen too many 'internet era' let downs to be taken in by it anymore.

My expectations for the rest of winter is close to zero so anything else is a bonus, this approach worked last week when a 8cms snowfall popped up out of nowhere on Saturday afternoon, but I am convinced winter 2016 will pass without a proper spell of wintry weather across the UK.

Andy (aka Victor Meldrew)

Originally Posted by: Andy Woodcock 

What's your thoughts on winter 2016/17 Andy. 😜

Gandalf The White
21 January 2016 23:59:29

ECM 12z ensemble for London:


http://www.weathercast.co.uk/services/ensemble-forecast.html



The Op was at the top end of the ensemble set and an outlier at times for daytime maxima. There's a lot of scatter there after around Day 5 but nothing very cold on offer.  In fact the chart doesn't look dissimilar to those back in December when it was hard to find so much as an air frost.


So, sensitivity to the opening position doesn't at the moment yield anything promising for cold weather fans - but that's not to say that a new signal could appear, just as it did a couple of weeks ago.


 


Location: South Cambridgeshire
130 metres ASL
52.0N 0.1E


Retron
22 January 2016 06:28:17


Being disparaging is not my aim. In fact after lengthy scrutiny I get the gist of what the author is trying to explain. What I am however is an exponent of sensible English and will criticise anyone who appears to use over-complex terminology when more sensible and widely understandable phrases will suffice. I am a scientist by profession and peer-review countless publications, and if I was presented with a piece like that it would be referred after the first paragraph. Sorry off topic but I have a right to reply (or maybe not).


Originally Posted by: nsrobins 


I wholeheartedly agree with this! Nothing turns people off a subject or makes them seem unapproachable than using technobabble, which is frankly all this talk of Wave 1, Wave 2, MJO, (GL)AAM, MT etc is. As I've said before, all that stuff essentially boils down to "are we going to see stratospheric warming?" or "will we see disruption to the vortex" and, if so, whether it'll shove the polar vortex aside or split it asunder. If either of those happens, it then becomes a case of will it affect us at all?


I'm convinced egos have a large part to play in all this, as using techno-babble makes people feel superior. It's not just in weather, either, my field (IT) is full of the stuff - and people love to quote it to users, even though it's of no use to them whatsoever. People tend to just nod along, as they don't want to be seen to be "thickos" by saying they don't fully understand what they're reading.


Whilst I appreciate the effort the likes of Tamara put in, the way they deliver their information is all but useless.


Anyway, back to the models. The theory at the moment amongst the stratosphere folks is that the polar vortex is going to take a wander from northern Canada over to Scandinavia, allowing some ridging to occur over the Atlantic. This would then allow northwesterly or westerly winds to dominate, rather than the SW'lies we're going to experience over the coming days.


As it happens, for the first time in ages the ECM-32 control run backs this up - after 360, it shows repeated northerly -> NW'ly > westerly > northerly cycles as ridging repeatedly forms to the west. It's unexciting for coldies, though, as it restricts snow to Scotland.


Last night's 15-day ECM control run also shows ridging to the west with some colder NW'ly winds over the UK by the end of its run (it goes out to 360). However, the control was one of the coldest members by then and as such wasn't well supported.


Leysdown, north Kent
Scandy 1050 MB
22 January 2016 06:55:46


 


I wholeheartedly agree with this! Nothing turns people off a subject or makes them seem unapproachable than using technobabble, which is frankly all this talk of Wave 1, Wave 2, MJO, (GL)AAM, MT etc is. As I've said before, all that stuff essentially boils down to "are we going to see stratospheric warming?" or "will we see disruption to the vortex" and, if so, whether it'll shove the polar vortex aside or split it asunder. If either of those happens, it then becomes a case of will it affect us at all?


I'm convinced egos have a large part to play in all this, as using techno-babble makes people feel superior. It's not just in weather, either, my field (IT) is full of the stuff - and people love to quote it to users, even though it's of no use to them whatsoever. People tend to just nod along, as they don't want to be seen to be "thickos" by saying they don't fully understand what they're reading.


Whilst I appreciate the effort the likes of Tamara put in, the way they deliver their information is all but useless.


Anyway, back to the models. The theory at the moment amongst the stratosphere folks is that the polar vortex is going to take a wander from northern Canada over to Scandinavia, allowing some ridging to occur over the Atlantic. This would then allow northwesterly or westerly winds to dominate, rather than the SW'lies we're going to experience over the coming days.


As it happens, for the first time in ages the ECM-32 control run backs this up - after 360, it shows repeated northerly -> NW'ly > westerly > northerly cycles as ridging repeatedly forms to the west. It's unexciting for coldies, though, as it restricts snow to Scotland.


Last night's 15-day ECM control run also shows ridging to the west with some colder NW'ly winds over the UK by the end of its run (it goes out to 360). However, the control was one of the coldest members by then and as such wasn't well supported.


Originally Posted by: Retron 


I agree IT wise - unfortunately work in it myself where everyone likes to use shortened words to describe the full description as you say - also where everyone thinks you love your job so are happy to do things in your own time for them as well because you do IT, NOPE!  


 


Anyway back to MO  , quite poor runs this morning and on face value you'd be hard placed to see anything inspiring - GFS /ECM is quite simply poor if cold is what you are after. Only hope we have is that the High pressure is close enough at times to break up the endless cloudy mild days with some sunny spells so at least we can have some early spring weather. Amuses me how the GFS strat warming at the latter stages of FI keeps getting pushed back, originally it was happening on the 27th January now it's the 5th February - either the model hasn't a clue or it's a vague signal it is picking up for something that might happen. Let's hope something shows up in the runs soon as becoming rather dull output once again.

Gooner
22 January 2016 07:07:13

There really isn't much to grab at currently, rather hoping something will pop up out of the blue


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Gooner
22 January 2016 07:08:53

The PV does seem to be on the move



Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Whether Idle
22 January 2016 07:27:33

Not even any "jam tomorrow" charts on offer. 


Slim pickings indeed.  The best that can be gleaned is a Pm airmass advancing into the NE quadrant at day 10 on the ECM, as shown above.


Dover, 5m asl. Half a mile from the south coast.
Sinky1970
22 January 2016 07:43:51
Pretty much box standard British weather for the foreseeable.
Shropshire
22 January 2016 07:45:41


Not even any "jam tomorrow" charts on offer. 


Slim pickings indeed.  The best that can be gleaned is a Pm airmass advancing into the NE quadrant at day 10 on the ECM, as shown above.


Originally Posted by: Whether Idle 


Yep, we've begun zonality again - will it be the usual 4 week affair or can we see a change in the pattern ? It certainly has a 10 day shelf life at the very least looking at this morning's runs. 


A Scandi trough looks very likely but we need upstream changes to break the overall set-up of low heights at Northern latitudes.


From December 27th 2020, zonality will be banned from mixing with the UK. We appreciate that this may come as a shock to younger people and old Uncle Barty. This ban will last for a minimum of ten days.
Shropshire
22 January 2016 07:47:48

Pretty much box standard British weather for the foreseeable.

Originally Posted by: Sinky1970 


 


I think you mean 'bog' - much more appropriate anyway given that we have actually gone from an outlook a few days ago where the majority of runs showed rather benign mild weather, especially for the South, to what is now quite wet and windy conventional zonality.


From December 27th 2020, zonality will be banned from mixing with the UK. We appreciate that this may come as a shock to younger people and old Uncle Barty. This ban will last for a minimum of ten days.
backtobasics
22 January 2016 08:09:59


 


Yep, we've begun zonality again - will it be the usual 4 week affair or can we see a change in the pattern ? It certainly has a 10 day shelf life at the very least looking at this morning's runs. 


A Scandi trough looks very likely but we need upstream changes to break the overall set-up of low heights at Northern latitudes.


Originally Posted by: Shropshire 


 


Good luck with those comments Shropshire.   not looking good for those seeking cold but as always something can crop up any time.  No one knows when or if that time will come.  there will be some serious gnashing of teeth if the best that February will offer is a 2-3 day toppler  though which is my fear.

Andy Woodcock
22 January 2016 08:13:48
Crap runs this morning with any hope of wintry weather confined to the north and only then in FI.

At least the days are getting longer and my March trip to Lanzarote closer, it's my annual treat for putting up with yet another Bartlett British winter, God I hate Bartletts.

Andy
Andy Woodcock
Penrith
Cumbria

Altitude 535 feet

"Why are the British so worried about climate change? Any change to their climate can only be an improvement" John Daley 2001
Gooner
22 January 2016 08:19:01


Not even any "jam tomorrow" charts on offer. 


Slim pickings indeed.  The best that can be gleaned is a Pm airmass advancing into the NE quadrant at day 10 on the ECM, as shown above.


Originally Posted by: Whether Idle 


It is a waiting game it seems


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


idj20
22 January 2016 08:27:48

Have to say, it is unusual to see such unanimous agreement across the board in the 240 hours range. A pity they are all showing the zonality variety with the wind alternating between tropical maritime south west and the occasional visiting blink-and-you-miss-it north west polar maritime flow. 
  Hopefully us South East massive may end up getting to have the best of the drier and brighter weather as we tend to be on the "lee side" of such a flow but that's me trying to be as optimistic as possible (the middle part of next week looks potentially wet & windy with a risk of further gales - again).

Still keeping half an eye open on the 30 hpa going ons as that is showing some interest. Not quite the full on SSW warming we are looking for and probably won't do anything for us at surface level later on down the line, but it is quite a different set up compared to the last two winters.


Folkestone Harbour. 
Maunder Minimum
22 January 2016 08:31:12

Pretty much bog standard British weather for the foreseeable.

Originally Posted by: Sinky1970 


Meanwhile, the lucky USA prepares for a monster blizzard:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-35374741


Life is so unfair!


But it is a general rule of thumb that when the US is basking in a fabulous winter wonderland, we invariably get the grey, dull, soggy, sodding awful Atlantic on this side of the Pond!


 


New world order coming.
soperman
22 January 2016 08:48:01
Crikey

If the GFS hires is accurate there is an awful lot of rain in store for the North.

Flooding to become an issue again I fear
Andy Woodcock
22 January 2016 08:49:39
I don't subscribe to the US cold/UK mild theory, some of the coldest ever winters in the US were 1977, 1978 and 1979, all of which were cold here.

Our misery isn't due to the cold US but I am not sure what is causing these recent winters dominated by an enhance zonal flow.

Remember just three years ago all the talk was of the recent UK cold winters being caused by reduced Arctic Sea Ice and we should expect more cold winters in the future, that didn't turn out well!

Andy
Andy Woodcock
Penrith
Cumbria

Altitude 535 feet

"Why are the British so worried about climate change? Any change to their climate can only be an improvement" John Daley 2001
David M Porter
22 January 2016 08:51:16

There is still time for a change, and we're not in the "last chance saloon" yet. For all we know, by the time we reach 31st January the models may look somewhat more promising for another cold spell.. Look at what happened over Xmas & New Year, when after having produced day after day of very mild runs throughout most of December, they began to indicated a change to something less mild as we went into the New Year.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
JACKO4EVER
22 January 2016 08:56:27
Morning All.
The Atlantic returns and with that comes some bouts of wind and rain. Fairly solid agreement out to day 10 on most output for a continuation of the same. With the rise in temperatures I would expect the January CET to now come in above average. This leads us into February which is anyone's guess, but with the cold ramping up stateside I wouldn't bet too much against a continuation of the same.
Brian Gaze
22 January 2016 09:01:13


 I think you mean 'bog' - much more appropriate anyway given that we have actually gone from an outlook a few days ago where the majority of runs showed rather benign mild weather, especially for the South, to what is now quite wet and windy conventional zonality.


Originally Posted by: Shropshire 


Yes the NWP trend in the last couple of days has been to favour the more unsettled conditions extending southwards. Today's MetO update will be interesting.


Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
David M Porter
22 January 2016 09:04:11

Morning All.
The Atlantic returns and with that comes some bouts of wind and rain. Fairly solid agreement out to day 10 on most output for a continuation of the same. With the rise in temperatures I would expect the January CET to now come in above average. This leads us into February which is anyone's guess, but with the cold ramping up stateside I wouldn't bet too much against a continuation of the same.

Originally Posted by: JACKO4EVER 


Maybe the cold over in the east of the USA will ease a bit if/when the polar vortex begins to shift eastwards from Greenland to Scandi, as LW mentioned above. We shall see.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022

Remove ads from site

Ads