I wholeheartedly agree with this! Nothing turns people off a subject or makes them seem unapproachable than using technobabble, which is frankly all this talk of Wave 1, Wave 2, MJO, (GL)AAM, MT etc is. As I've said before, all that stuff essentially boils down to "are we going to see stratospheric warming?" or "will we see disruption to the vortex" and, if so, whether it'll shove the polar vortex aside or split it asunder. If either of those happens, it then becomes a case of will it affect us at all?
I'm convinced egos have a large part to play in all this, as using techno-babble makes people feel superior. It's not just in weather, either, my field (IT) is full of the stuff - and people love to quote it to users, even though it's of no use to them whatsoever. People tend to just nod along, as they don't want to be seen to be "thickos" by saying they don't fully understand what they're reading.
Whilst I appreciate the effort the likes of Tamara put in, the way they deliver their information is all but useless.
Anyway, back to the models. The theory at the moment amongst the stratosphere folks is that the polar vortex is going to take a wander from northern Canada over to Scandinavia, allowing some ridging to occur over the Atlantic. This would then allow northwesterly or westerly winds to dominate, rather than the SW'lies we're going to experience over the coming days.
As it happens, for the first time in ages the ECM-32 control run backs this up - after 360, it shows repeated northerly -> NW'ly > westerly > northerly cycles as ridging repeatedly forms to the west. It's unexciting for coldies, though, as it restricts snow to Scotland.
Last night's 15-day ECM control run also shows ridging to the west with some colder NW'ly winds over the UK by the end of its run (it goes out to 360). However, the control was one of the coldest members by then and as such wasn't well supported.
Originally Posted by: Retron