Remove ads from site

Brian Gaze
10 April 2020 16:59:27
We also should be told:

1) how many NHS staff were tested

2) what the underlying health conditions are

Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
Polar Low
10 April 2020 17:02:00

Talking about smoking and SD this morning on radio apparently the exhaled cigarette  smoke is not the issue with SD but it is if the smoker coughs within the exhaled cigarette smoke how many smokers don’t cough?




 


Who knows. Take a look at this article. 


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/coronavirus-outbreak-peak-could-next-21769853


A paper from Imperial College suggested peak UK deaths on April 5th at around 260. It highlights the limitations of the modelling or the assumptions underlying it. I remember people suggesting a) we'd do better than China because fewer people here smoke b) we'd do better than Italy because the social structure is different, we're less touchy feely and fewer of us live in high density flats. 


Originally Posted by: Brian Gaze 

westv
10 April 2020 17:06:20


Talking about smoking and SD this morning on radio apparently the exhaled cigarette  smoke is not the issue with SD but it is if the smoker coughs within the exhaled cigarette smoke how many smokers don’t cough?


 


Originally Posted by: Polar Low 


Surely the important thing is whether they cover their mouths when coughing.


At least it will be mild!
JHutch
10 April 2020 17:07:40

I read the posts earlier on regarding the number of real cases (not just reported cases) as a percent of population. It really would be nice to know this although I understand how difficult it is to find out, may of minor note that with the number of cases having now gone up c. 5,000 to c. 74,000, and the UK population being 66 million, this means that we have gone just over 0.1% of the population having officially tested positive. We all know that there are more cases than officially reported and that it is generally only the hospitalisations which are getting tested rather than the more minor/asymptomatic cases - if what I have read is true then 1% of the population having tested positive seems believeable. A figure of, say, 10% rather less so unless there are a lot more asymptomatic cases than are currently thought. This is all just me speculating but just thought it may be of some interest.


Regarding people thinking they have it and testing negative. I think that most bugs will cover some of the common covid-19 symptoms and, with the number of deaths being reported, people will likely be worried that they have covid-19 whereas normally they may just carry on with their everyday life and not really think twice about their slight temperature/cough. One of my housemates told us she had mild symptoms of covid-19 but it turned out to be hay fever...

Phil G
10 April 2020 17:08:27
BBC done it again!
They have a virus update programme which started at 4pm where the main event is the update itself. The update went on a bit and they were coming to an end of the Q&A, but the BBC cut it short and went to the news summary at 6.
Why couldn't they just let the Q&A finish then go to the summary straight after? Just using the update as a space filler?
Polar Low
10 April 2020 17:09:37

How much smoke do they stop if a cough is present after exhaled and how many smokers will adapt to this new condition 


 




 


Surely the important thing is whether they cover their mouths when coughing.


Originally Posted by: westv 

Gandalf The White
10 April 2020 17:14:24


Disappointing that the more usually a virus mutates the less severe it becomes. But that doesn’t seem the case in the current state of reality.


https://www.healthline.com/health-news/what-to-know-about-mutation-and-covid-19#The-new-coronavirus-is-mutating,-but-very-slowly


 


 


 


Originally Posted by: Polar Low 


This is something you and I exchanged comments about yesterday. This does confirm the random nature of mutations and from that the chance of strains that are more dangerous to their host.


What I found fascinating was the evidence that evolutionary forces work to optimise the virus for the dominant form of host from region to region.


Location: South Cambridgeshire
130 metres ASL
52.0N 0.1E


CreweCold
10 April 2020 17:14:30

I've smoked on and off for 12 years and never had a smokers cough.


Then again I've never really smoked more than 10 a day, some people get through 30.



Crewe, Cheshire
55 metres above sea level
Phil G
10 April 2020 17:15:25
Not sure if I heard Hancock say there were 742 million pieces of PPE kit. If that is true that's a hell of a lot. Then he seemed to suggest the NHS not using appropriate equipment when needed, which sounds like a bit of a shortage.
Retron
10 April 2020 17:15:40


Disappointing that the more usually a virus mutates the less severe it becomes. But that doesn’t seem the case in the current state of reality.


https://www.healthline.com/health-news/what-to-know-about-mutation-and-covid-19#The-new-coronavirus-is-mutating,-but-very-slowly


Originally Posted by: Polar Low 


An excellent article and one which should fill us all with a bit more hope. It explains that the mutations, although numerous, are slower than usually seen with RNA viruses and thus a vaccine should be achieveable.


It also mentions that in the case of SARS, antibodies are present for around 2 years, but even after that a memory is retained within the cells of our bodies. Hopefully the same will apply to this close relation of SARS!


 


Leysdown, north Kent
CreweCold
10 April 2020 17:17:05

Surely if a strain has been evident from September, it backs up the suggestion of a strain having worked through the UK in December, just like people have speculated. It could be that mutation has made it more lethal.



Crewe, Cheshire
55 metres above sea level
Gandalf The White
10 April 2020 17:17:10

Why did the chief nurse and the Matt Hancock both not answer the question today about how many NHS workers had died.

Matt glibly passed over the the chief nurse who said it was confidential. How is a number confidential?

These briefings really are useless.

Now the prime minister is better. The media really need to address and challenge the government regarding the fact there were 980 deaths

Originally Posted by: Heavy Weather 2013 


The 980 deaths is not the true figure for yesterday, as Gavin has said several times already. I don't see why it merits all this attention when it's giving a completely false picture?


Location: South Cambridgeshire
130 metres ASL
52.0N 0.1E


Gandalf The White
10 April 2020 17:20:33


Surely if a strain has been evident from September, it backs up the suggestion of a strain having worked through the UK in December, just like people have speculated. It could be that mutation has made it more lethal.


Originally Posted by: CreweCold 


Yes, that occurred to me as well. Even if it happened to be in late October rather than September, that's still plenty of time for the virus to make its way around the planet. 


All speculation, of course, and we'll never know for certain.


Location: South Cambridgeshire
130 metres ASL
52.0N 0.1E


Polar Low
10 April 2020 17:21:12

Indeed, I guess the burning question is if you had one say type B are you done or are further mutations making it more likely cause for concern 


 




 


This is something you and I exchanged comments about yesterday. This does confirm the random nature of mutations and from that the chance of strains that are more dangerous to their host.


What I found fascinating was the evidence that evolutionary forces work to optimise the virus for the dominant form of host from region to region.


Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White 

Heavy Weather 2013
10 April 2020 17:22:04
Sky news mention the death toll and then roll straight into how the curve is flattening blah blah blah. The death toll today is horrific. They should be holding the government to account.


Mark
Beckton, E London
Less than 500m from the end of London City Airport runway.
Essan
10 April 2020 17:22:48

Why did the chief nurse and the Matt Hancock both not answer the question today about how many NHS workers had died.

Matt glibly passed over the the chief nurse who said it was confidential. How is a number confidential?

These briefings really are useless.

Now the prime minister is better. The media really need to address and challenge the government regarding the fact there were 980 deaths

Originally Posted by: Heavy Weather 2013 



Do you really think anyone in the media is even capable of understanding that 980 people did not die yesterday?   Or even that it will be some days before we have accurate figures of how many died on any individual day (current figures suggest we have reached a plateau but that may be misleading)

However bad the government might be, the media make Frump look like a child genious     Partly becase they understand this virus in the same way thay understand the weather.


Andy
Evesham, Worcs, Albion - 35m asl
Weather & Earth Science News 

Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job - DNA
David M Porter
10 April 2020 17:29:50


 


That was fascinating, thanks.


Several statements caught my eye: the large number of mutations already seen; the infection route; and this comment "While the latest work has yet to be peer-reviewed, Forster says the results suggest that the first infection and spread among humans of COVID-19 occurred between mid-September and early December."


The first jump to humans potentially as early as mid-September? Wow.


Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White 


Hi Peter


I guess it is entirely possible that the disease was in existence and was circulating in China for some time before anyone there first realised that something was seriously wrong.


On the BBC news channel the other day, newsreader Carrie Gracie did an interview with a guy who I think is in his 30s and lives and works as an English teacher in Wuhan. He recalled feeling unwell back in late November/early December but wasn't seriously so as far as I remember him saying. He mentioned that some time afterwards, he had the swab test for Covid-19 which revealed he had been infected with the virus. As far as is know, he was the first person from the UK living anywhere in the world who tested positive for the virus.


It could well be that the virus was in existence and was being transmitted from person to person in China some time before that country reached crisis point back in December & January.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
John p
10 April 2020 17:30:19




Do you really think anyone in the media is even capable of understanding that 980 people did not die yesterday?   Or even that it will be some days before we have accurate figures of how many died on any individual day (current figures suggest we have reached a plateau but that may be misleading)

However bad the government might be, the media make Frump look like a child genious     Partly becase they understand this virus in the same way thay understand the weather.


Originally Posted by: Essan 


That also means that more people probably died on previously recorded dates as they weren’t picked up at the time.  It’s possible less than 980 died yesterday, but equally possible more did. 
The whole thing is farcical. I’d not be surprised if circa 500 are reported tomorrow and the media predicting we’ve passed the worst!


Camberley, Surrey
Quantum
10 April 2020 17:32:11

JFF model update:


There are some number problems again. Just going to use the daily figures as cumulatives do not add up. Anyway for 13543 people tested:


Model prediction: 4887


Actual: 5706



So quite a big deviation from the model today, also first time the model has significantly underestimated the number of confirmed cases. On the plus side testing has also gone up more than expected so will incoperate that into future projections.


Not going to change any parameters yet, this is only a one off. Although it is the first figure I've been concerned about. Quite a bit higher than I expected.


2023/2024 Snow days (approx 850hpa temp):
29/11 (-6), 30/11 (-6), 02/12 (-5), 03/12 (-5), 04/12 (-3), 16/01 (-3), 18/01 (-8), 08/02 (-5)

Total: 8 days with snow/sleet falling.

2022/2023 Snow days (approx 850hpa temp):

18/12 (-1), 06/03 (-6), 08/03 (-8), 09/03 (-6), 10/03 (-8), 11/03 (-5), 14/03 (-6)

Total: 7 days with snow/sleet falling.

2021/2022 Snow days (approx 850hpa temp):

26/11 (-5), 27/11 (-7), 28/11 (-6), 02/12 (-6), 06/01 (-5), 07/01 (-6), 06/02 (-5), 19/02 (-5), 24/02 (-7), 30/03 (-7), 31/03 (-8), 01/04 (-8)
Total: 12 days with snow/sleet falling.
chelseagirl
10 April 2020 17:33:43


I've smoked on and off for 12 years and never had a smokers cough.


Then again I've never really smoked more than 10 a day, some people get through 30.


Originally Posted by: CreweCold 


Never used to cough. Now, 10 years on, every time I have a cold, I get a cough. 


The Fenlands of Cambridgeshire
Gooner
10 April 2020 17:36:27

BBC done it again!
They have a virus update programme which started at 4pm where the main event is the update itself. The update went on a bit and they were coming to an end of the Q&A, but the BBC cut it short and went to the news summary at 6.
Why couldn't they just let the Q&A finish then go to the summary straight after? Just using the update as a space filler?

Originally Posted by: Phil G 


I know absolutely madness , what was Matt H's answer to holding meetings that don't follow the 2 metre rule??


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Brian Gaze
10 April 2020 17:39:05

Google and Apple plan to release a contact tracing API by mid may. Good news IMO. It also makes a nonsense of the UK govt / NHS ambition to have their own app by the end of this month. 


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52246319


 


Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
David M Porter
10 April 2020 17:39:35


 


Yes, that occurred to me as well. Even if it happened to be in late October rather than September, that's still plenty of time for the virus to make its way around the planet. 


All speculation, of course, and we'll never know for certain.


Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White 


There has been speculation about that among some of my friends on Facebook too lately. A girl whom I knew at primary and secondary school recently recounted how she felt not great for a number of days during the festive season with 'flu type symptoms. This was, to the best of my recollection, at least a couple of weeks before any of the UK media first reported the existence of the disease in China.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
Brian Gaze
10 April 2020 17:40:40


JFF model update:


There are some number problems again. Just going to use the daily figures as cumulatives do not add up. Anyway for 13543 people tested:


Model prediction: 4887


Actual: 5706



So quite a big deviation from the model today, also first time the model has significantly underestimated the number of confirmed cases. On the plus side testing has also gone up more than expected so will incoperate that into future projections.


Not going to change any parameters yet, this is only a one off. Although it is the first figure I've been concerned about. Quite a bit higher than I expected.


Originally Posted by: Quantum 


Have you considered the impact of tests on NHS workers? Apparently 80% of them are coming back negative. I provided a link earlier today.


Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
CreweCold
10 April 2020 17:40:51


 


Yes, that occurred to me as well. Even if it happened to be in late October rather than September, that's still plenty of time for the virus to make its way around the planet. 


All speculation, of course, and we'll never know for certain.


Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White 


Even more speculation, and something I've thought about, could the wide range of effects of this virus (from nothing more than a slight temperature to death) hinge on previous exposure to the original pathogen? Maybe it isn't so much pot luck but more about partial immunity and of course comorbidities.



Crewe, Cheshire
55 metres above sea level

Remove ads from site

Ads