Remove ads from site

Joe Bloggs
07 January 2024 10:25:16

Yes, it’s what happens after that which is causing all the headaches. The potential is very much there and the timescale is getting closer. A wobble back to colder conditions (further south) would be encouraging, a wobble away would be a bit of a worry. 

This definitely fits into the encouraging category: https://www.wetterzentrale.de/maps/GFSOPEU06_204_2.png  

Originally Posted by: doctormog 



Yes it’s a very good run as we receive the CAA, clean as a whistle.

Thats despite the heights over Iberia. 

To be honest I’m not sure whether it’s worthy analysing the run any further than approx T+200. 

Manchester City Centre, 31m ASL

doctormog
07 January 2024 10:29:52

Yes it’s a very good run as we receive the CAA, clean as a whistle.

Thats despite the heights over Iberia. 

To be honest I’m not sure whether it’s worthy analysing the run any further than approx T+200

Originally Posted by: Joe Bloggs 



Probably not, beyond the general trends, but it is fun. 😁
Joe Bloggs
07 January 2024 10:30:26
If we can get this setup to T+120 (day 5) then I will feel much more confident.

So fingers crossed for Tuesday morning. 

https://www.wetterzentrale.de/maps/GFSOPEU06_168_1.png 

A clean cold Arctic northerly first, followed by messy attempted incursions from the Atlantic against thin wedges of high pressure to our NW = snow.

 

Manchester City Centre, 31m ASL

nsrobins
07 January 2024 10:36:00



To be honest I’m not sure whether it’s worthy analysing the run any further than approx T+200. 

Originally Posted by: Joe Bloggs 



I’d suggest T+180 is probably stretching it. This story has a way to go yet.
Neil
Fareham, Hampshire 28m ASL (near estuary)
Stormchaser, Member TORRO
ozone_aurora
07 January 2024 10:43:25

To be honest I’m not sure whether it’s worthy analysing the run any further than approx T+200. 

Originally Posted by: Joe Bloggs 


Probably best idea not to. :)

I normally don't exceed 10 days run. Not sure what that is in scientific terms, i.e, what is T+200 exactly and what is it in days?
doctormog
07 January 2024 10:47:51

Probably best idea not to.

I normally don't exceed 10 days run. Not sure what that is in scientific terms, i.e, what is T+200 exactly and what is it in days?

Originally Posted by: ozone_aurora 



It is around day 8 and can be useful for trends if there is a consistent overall pattern (especially in the ensemble data). 

However in reality it is often discounted as FI if it shows real cold but taken as a worrying sign if it shows a breakdown in cold on any one op run. 😉
Joe Bloggs
07 January 2024 10:55:00

Probably best idea not to.

I normally don't exceed 10 days run. Not sure what that is in scientific terms, i.e, what is T+200 exactly and what is it in days?

Originally Posted by: ozone_aurora 



Haha sorry I should have said a more specific number like T+192 , day 8. T+216, day 9 or T+240, day 10. 

Basically, what I was trying to stay (badly) was that I’m looking to get the clean cold northerly in place first, I’m not arsed what happens afterwards at this stage as it’s too uncertain. 

But without the initial CAA, we will struggle with potential snow events into FI. 

If we can get this initial northerly push, we could get a lot of snow as the pattern attempts to break down, given current background signals. 

Manchester City Centre, 31m ASL

Joe Bloggs
07 January 2024 11:04:11
Using the crucial Day 7 timestamp.

06z GEFS - almost rock solid support for the op. Encouraging.

https://www.wetterzentrale.de/maps/GFSPANELEU06_168_1.png 

 

Manchester City Centre, 31m ASL

ballamar
07 January 2024 11:10:52

Using the crucial Day 7 timestamp.

06z GEFS - almost rock solid support for the op. Encouraging.

https://www.wetterzentrale.de/maps/GFSPANELEU06_168_1.png 

 

Originally Posted by: Joe Bloggs 


Very encouraging hopefully the signal gets stronger - small changes have long term impacts
Phil24
07 January 2024 11:17:45
The trend still seems to lean towards the 14/15th as being the trigger that some elude to, the charts are moving around at that time quite a lot but they seem to keep the same theme overall.  

I truly can’t believe that after all the indications over the last couple of weeks won’t lead to something of potential mid January, but that’s just my opinion as we all know, there are many permutations that can put the mockers on the reality. The main one that could destroy all hopes is what seems to be a reinvigorated PV, looks like it might be on steroids. 
AJ*
  • AJ*
  • Advanced Member
07 January 2024 11:26:34

Haha sorry I should have said a more specific number like T+192 , day 8. T+216, day 9 or T+240, day 10. 

Basically, what I was trying to stay (badly) was that I’m looking to get the clean cold northerly in place first, I’m not arsed what happens afterwards at this stage as it’s too uncertain. 

But without the initial CAA, we will struggle with potential snow events into FI. 

If we can get this initial northerly push, we could get a lot of snow as the pattern attempts to break down, given current background signals. 

Originally Posted by: Joe Bloggs 



@Brian Gaze
Brian,
This discussion has prompted me to make a suggestion. Would it be simple to add the T+ values to the X-axis of the ensemble plots? At the moment there's just the dates ahead, and on the 850hPa temps the snow row, and to work out that 7 days ahead means T+168 takes a bit of effort. (I'm thinking of the GFS as that's the one I refer to mostly.) Adding these values to the X-axis would make correlating the forecast charts - when referred to by T+ figures - to the ensemble plots much easier.
Thanks, AJ
Angus; one of the Kent crew on TWO.
Tonbridge, 40m (131ft) asl
Retron
07 January 2024 11:30:47
As noted in the media thread, it's good to see the MetO mentioning settling snow down here. As part of the ice warning recently issued,

"A few of the snow showers could turn quite heavy; these probably only affecting a narrow zone but a few places could see 1-3 cm, mainly over the north Downs and on grassy surfaces."
Leysdown, north Kent
doctormog
07 January 2024 11:32:40
On the subject of the ensemble data the GEFS 06z set has colder air more prevalent further south in the medium term when compared with the 00z suite.

This is the mean at day 10: https://www.wetterzentrale.de/maps/GFSAVGEU06_240_2.png 

A blip or a trend back to a colder outcome? We might know more this evening, or maybe not!
Col
  • Col
  • Advanced Member
07 January 2024 11:39:32

As noted in the media thread, it's good to see the MetO mentioning settling snow down here. As part of the ice warning recently issued,

"A few of the snow showers could turn quite heavy; these probably only affecting a narrow zone but a few places could see 1-3 cm, mainly over the north Downs and on grassy surfaces."

Originally Posted by: Retron 



Grassy surfaces? Really pushing the boat out there aren't they, what's next, settling on pavements?
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg
Retron
07 January 2024 11:40:49

Grassy surfaces? Really pushing the boat out there aren't they, what's next, settling on pavements?

Originally Posted by: Col 


Welcome to life in the south. Any snow is noteworthy down here! 😁

Edit: and having checked my records there have only been two occasions in the last decade with a complete snow cover at 9AM here. A few days in 2021, and again in 2018. *That* is how rare snow is down here!

The warning will also have been issued as the hundreds of thousands of drivers crossing the Downs in the rush hour tomorrow may be unaware of things turning a bit slippery.
Leysdown, north Kent
Brian Gaze
07 January 2024 11:44:35

@Brian Gaze
Brian,
This discussion has prompted me to make a suggestion. Would it be simple to add the T+ values to the X-axis of the ensemble plots? At the moment there's just the dates ahead, and on the 850hPa temps the snow row, and to work out that 7 days ahead means T+168 takes a bit of effort. (I'm thinking of the GFS as that's the one I refer to mostly.) Adding these values to the X-axis would make correlating the forecast charts - when referred to by T+ figures - to the ensemble plots much easier.
Thanks, AJ

Originally Posted by: AJ* 



It could be crowded, but I'll give it some thought. GEFS shorts are available to people with a login and they go out to t+192 hours, so they are easier in that sense.

UserPostedImage
Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
fairweather
07 January 2024 11:53:26

Good shout!  Amazing to think that the pattern change has only just happened and already we are looking at what may
be a return to 'normal service' within 12 days.  Sometimes I pine for the days when all that we had was 3 day models of the synoptic type!  Well, I so enjoyed the fine weather this Saturday and yes a snowfest for the South does look somewhat less likely from current output, but please let's at least have some more like today before any return to  default!

Originally Posted by: UncleAlbert 



They get little mention on here but I still like to have a look at the Met Office Fax charts.
S.Essex, 42m ASL
Retron
07 January 2024 11:58:29

They get little mention on here but I still like to have a look at the Met Office Fax charts.

Originally Posted by: fairweather 


Oh, good point - I've checked the latest one, for 6z tomorrow, and (forgive me for getting a bit excited) - YES! - there's a convergence zone over the Thames Estuary! UserPostedImage That'll be why the warning was issued, then, as they're Good News for those wanting a spell of persistent snow showers.

https://www.meteociel.fr/ukmo/fax/fax24.gif?07-6 

UserPostedImage
(That's the cropped version, showing the convergence zone. A rare sight indeed.)
Leysdown, north Kent
fairweather
07 January 2024 12:02:50

Just gone through the precipitation radar forcast for tomorrow on the Met Office and they are forecasting a fair narrow streamer flowing from 5am to 11am from a line Rochester -Maidstone- Tunbridge Wells -Brighton, a very similar line that was followed in early Dec 2009 event.Some red echos in there too so could be interesting. 

Originally Posted by: CField 

Just need a SE track locally here just the other side of Retron across the estuary.
S.Essex, 42m ASL
nsrobins
07 January 2024 12:05:12
It’s remarkable how quickly heights drain from Greenland and we’re back to the Atlantic by day 12. Support from the suite for this now growing. 
Neil
Fareham, Hampshire 28m ASL (near estuary)
Stormchaser, Member TORRO
fairweather
07 January 2024 12:07:48

I think that the settings have been changed. I can't find the graph with the GFS ensembles any more. That's one of my first go-to's when I want an overview for the medium term forecast. 

Originally Posted by: Lionel Hutz 


I found that at first. For me they don't come up as line graphs until you click on  city below the main maps and then scroll back up a bit and they appear. Works for me anyway.
S.Essex, 42m ASL
Gandalf The White
07 January 2024 12:18:20

It is around day 8 and can be useful for trends if there is a consistent overall pattern (especially in the ensemble data). 

However in reality it is often discounted as FI if it shows real cold but taken as a worrying sign if it shows a breakdown in cold on any one op run. 😉

Originally Posted by: doctormog 



🤣 How very true.  Glass half empty, glass empty or never a glass there in the first place…. 😉

The postage stamps from the 06z at T+240 have about 60% with quite strong blocking still in the Greenland area, several what you might call ‘transitional’ (from blocked to more mobile) but none with a complete breakdown.
Location: South Cambridgeshire
130 metres ASL
52.0N 0.1E


fairweather
07 January 2024 12:27:13

Looked at the various ops this morning, generally nice although ECM was a bit 'meh' albeit it does tease the cold getting south at T240.

Not a great set of ECM ens IMBY with a lot of scatter suggesting any cold getting here from phase 2 is very uncertain and GFS has more scatter than of late albeit still good confidence for 3-4 days of colder uppers.  

Happily I then had a quick look at UKV for Monday and it looks rather nice IMBY, with showers moving through most parts of Kent - looks like the convection will be a little more widespread than just the odd streamer so hopefully most in the county will see something falling. Shower activity also looks robust enough to affect southern parts of the Midlands and Suffolk and to maintain intensity through Surrey and Hampshire all the way down to Devon and maybe even the Western most parts of Cornwall. I doubt it'll be a memorable event and I'm not really expecting anything beyond some falling snow and maybe small accumulations for MBY (I guess some places under any lines of showers may do a bit better) but it's a pretty decent place to be particularly given the uncertainty creeping in WRT the second cold wave and whether it'll get this far or stall further North. 

Cold and dry for the next few days, milder but not to anything more than average or a touch below then very uncertain but could still get 3-4 days of colder weather again. Definitely glass 3/4 full for me this morning - it's not as good as the strong signal for countrywide cold of a few days back but if the models had only just picked up on phase 2 I reckon most people would be pretty happy/excited with the possibilities shown.

Originally Posted by: Hippydave 


My view as well from the same area. The bigger picture is we had snow on Dec 1st, and now it is just the start of January. The alleged best time for a cold spell and we haven't had any charts like this in January for years. Generally February and March is better these days and we haven't had any of the sporadic "Winter's over"  posts that you usually get by now. 😂 I'm also moderately optimistic for the days ahead and beyond. The only thing that I do still find puzzling, is that there has been almost absolute agreement between all models and between runs that after the mild spell there would be a cold plunge. I know the models can only say what they see but if this does end "diluting" (as ECM has started to do) then why is this never addressed at the programming stage? Surely the point is that the expensive super computer should outperform our amateur guesses but more often than not we perform better in these deep cold predictions which makes a bit of a nonsense of it. 
S.Essex, 42m ASL
fairweather
07 January 2024 12:34:08

Probably best idea not to.

I normally don't exceed 10 days run. Not sure what that is in scientific terms, i.e, what is T+200 exactly and what is it in days?

Originally Posted by: ozone_aurora 


Just divide by 24. 240 is 10 and so on.
S.Essex, 42m ASL
fairweather
07 January 2024 12:37:04

Grassy surfaces? Really pushing the boat out there aren't they, what's next, settling on pavements?

Originally Posted by: Col 


🤣
S.Essex, 42m ASL

Remove ads from site

Ads