To start with, here's what I posted to a friend of mine on FB this morning:
"I have read a lot of posts on forums saying the ECM just looks wrong and that was my impression as well - to day 8 it was promising because the mid-Atlantic ridge was more pronounced and the low near the Azores further away.
Then it all went nuts with extremely fast progression of LP to the UK days 9-10.
I feel like I have seen ECM get carried away with developing depressions from major air mass clashes many times in the past.
I have a theory of sorts that this not only occurs but often leads to a flip-flop between over-amplified day 9-10 solutions and extremely flat ones as the more intense storms either drive strong WAA or power on eastward. At the moment I guess we're seeing a variant of the latter from ECM."
I wonder if anyone can shed any light on whether ECM might be prone to such a bias? I remember seeing a bias chart somewhere on another forum many days ago which seemed to suggest a tendency to have pressure too low toward the sub-tropics.
Looking at the other models, GFS has joined in with GFSP with regards to having a mid-Atlantic block reaching toward Greenland but without the proper undercut to create a full-on Greenland High.
I see this is a better way forward, because there are plenty of signs that low pressure will push through Greenland by the end of the year, and because of how the U.S. pattern is orientated out to day 10 (causing any Greenland High to develop too far west), the mid-Atlantic ridge scenario is a more effective way of driving low heights into Europe which could then support a high to our NE bringing a frigid easterly such as the GFSP 00z gets up to.
GEM supports the GFS/GFSP route apart from being even more amplified later on.
There's no clear signal either way from UKMO's day 6 chart.
So the 00z runs seem to be aligned with GFSP, GFS and GEM on one side and ECM on the other, UKMO standing out for the time being as it prefers to wait until nearer the time to make a decision (though I do wonder how MOGREPS are looking at the moment).
At a glance I can see that GEFS feature by far the most properly cold runs so far. Chart-form analysis to come shortly.
Before all of the above, I notice GFSP stands out from the rest as early as day 4:
GFS (left) represents one side of the argument, which is a low or two just W or SW of Iceland tracking east to reach the North sea by day 7 without merging with the Scandi trough that's in place on day 5. This is supported by UKMO.
GFSP (right) shows the other option, where the trough from SW of Iceland moves a little faster and merges with the Scandi trough. This is also shown by ECM and represents a quicker arrival of cold, though the runs do suggest that there is then more chance of shortwave development impeding the cold air flow.
Neither is really a preferred option, it's just an example of how soon the uncertainty over details starts to unfold.
Finally for now, another part of my FB message from earlier:
"It would be fantastic to see GFSP verify well for the final week of December, not just because of the synoptics but because it would represent a major triumph in NWP model forecasting, as the model has been so consistent with the relative lack of low pressure development near the Azores allowing the ridge to dominate proceedings and encourage low heights down into NW Europe and perhaps beyond"
I have my fingers crossed from that perspective
If you have any problems or queries relating to TWO you can Email
[email protected] https://twitter.com/peacockreports 2023's Homeland Extremes:
T-Max: 30.2°C 9th Sep (...!) | T-Min: -7.1°C 22nd & 23rd Jan | Wettest Day: 25.9mm 2nd Nov | Ice Days: 1 (2nd Dec -1.3°C in freezing fog)
Keep Calm and Forecast On