Donate to browse the TWO website without adverts until 31st December 2024. You'll also get access to extra features and supporting our ongoing development.
For full details please see Advert free access on our website.
Remove ads from site
#Breaking One of the two individuals who has tested positive for coronavirus is a student at the University of York, a university spokesman said pic.twitter.com/YwSkcH4XFV— PA Media (@PA) February 1, 2020
#Breaking One of the two individuals who has tested positive for coronavirus is a student at the University of York, a university spokesman said pic.twitter.com/YwSkcH4XFV
Piece in The Times today suggesting face masks are ineffective and cloth ones could even increase the risk of developing cold / flu (new or old).
Originally Posted by: Brian Gaze
A week or so ago an expert said that a mask was useful if you already had a bug as it reduced the chances of spreading the virus but could be worse than useless as a precautionary measure because the mask material gets damp and viruses can adhere to the surface.
I am not wearing them. My understanding is that they work but only if used right and regularly disposed of. My main precaution is avoidance.
Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White
That's basically what the Times article says.
Originally Posted by: Quantum
Are you holed up at home and not going out? I don’t know where you live but the chances of infection right now from even using the Tube in London must be vanishingly small.
Originally Posted by: Justin W
No I still go out but have cut back.
I've also bought enough supplies such that I can completely isolate myself for several weeks if necessary.
Well I'm off into town for the football (circa 3,000 gathered together), then some shopping, a pint, then back home on the bus. That would appear to violate all your pointers!
(Plus the wife works at York Uni).
I thought part of the benefit of a mask was that it avoided accidental touching of the nose or mouth.
Originally Posted by: westv
This is also true.
However I feel the same can be achived with regular hand washing and alcohol gel when out.
I read somewhere that gel is far less effective than soap and water. True??
Yes I think it's true.
I only use the gel when I'm out and about after touching a surface.
Soap and water when at home.
New paper suggests R0 is 4.0
That's really really bad.
I should add it is completely inconsistent with the most recent data.
”New paper”?
Originally Posted by: doctormog
Originally Posted by: xioni2
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018952v1
Thanks. I feel that may be a little premature based on current evidence.
If they are right (R0=4.08 and a mortality rate of 6.5%), that would be worrying, but I don't know how accurate their modelling is, it could be well off the mark.
I also think that R0 is on the high side, will point out there are other studies which put it at much lower values. But reporting this for completeness.
As I say my own crude analysis of the most recent data would seem to suggest an R0 of 4.0 (at least at this current time) is a little inconsistent.
The mortality rate is very believable, the R0 a little less so.
It may simply be out of date, because R0 could easily have been 4 a few weeks back.
Their cut off date was 25 Jan.
Polynomial fit works better than an exponential. Good sign.
Reports that bodies are being sent from hospitals to crematoria without being identified.