Still doesn't really mean anything - unless you test everyone with symptoms (impossible, pretty much) you will always have a high bias towards severe cases in hospitals.
EDIT: And given the 20-50 age group would be more socially active, more out and about and indeed are larger in number than the 65+ group, it's likely vastly more of them - percentage wise - are infected with the virus. It really skews the figures and I'd actually put very little faith on alarmist reports that young people are falling ill from it.
Yes, they are, but 0.1% of a large number is equal to 10% of a much smaller one!
Originally Posted by: Retron