Well, you agree with him???
It depends if he's got his figure for the number of people infected correct. As the article show, a small difference in the 'IFR' means a big difference in how many have been infected. How many people do you think have been infected in the UK? 20 million sounds high to me, but do either of us (or he) know until a lot of testing is done? Nope.
A lot of people have died, it doesn't feel like a flu epidemic (well less than 1% mortality) to me. Given we've seen effective lockdowns death would surely be vastly higher without it. But, the truth is neither the proff, or you or me know yet.
Originally Posted by: Devonian