Surely Man City must have a case to sue the player and not just fine him a couple of weeks wages?
Originally Posted by: wallaw
Suing him if City feel it necessary to cancel his contract is what's being mooted. The trouble is, let's assume his transfer value is £40m. If City cancel his contract, he can legally sign for another club without the need for a transfer fee to be paid to City (damn you, Bosman). So City lose £40m. Additionally, another club strengthens their team by picking up a top class player for nothing.
If they did sue him, would they likely recover £40m? Doubtful, even though he'd pocket a massive signing-on payment. Saying that, it's a nice thought to take him for every penny he's got and send him into bankruptcy.
Instead, I think they should just keep fining him 2 weeks wages every time he transgresses. The likely result would be that City just stop paying him, because he'd keep breaking the terms of his contract. And, if he did turn up when required, City could then make his life there so hellish that he'd be driven to go whingeing back to Argentina and break the terms of his contract...
The solution would be for another club to pay City what they value him at. £40m. If Tevez is so keen to move but feels the fee is restricting the ability of clubs to afford the transfer fee plus his wages, he'll accept a much-reduced contract.
Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan