Remove ads from site

Brian Gaze
26 June 2014 07:25:19


I wonder how many people he has bitten, off the pitch?.


But then again, how many players try to break each others legs?.


What's worse, a broken leg or a nip behind the ear?.


I'm not defending the Twat.btw.


Originally Posted by: AIMSIR 


We've already discussed this. A bite runs the risk of transmitting diseases whilst a broken leg (brutal as it is) generally doesn't. It amazes me that his punishment is likely to be only a fixed term ban. He should also face legal action, but above all psychiatric help. Until the psychiatrist 'signs off' he shouldn't be allowed on a football field again. 


Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
Matty H
26 June 2014 07:52:42
Never ceases to amaze me how people of such little intellect can find their way into power. Here's Uruguay's president, who I wouldn't even trust to run a small company let alone a country:

"We didn't choose him to be a philosopher or a mechanic or to have good manners. He's a great player.

"If we're going to take decisions in football based on what TV says, then there are loads of penalties and handballs you have to give that weren't given. So bad luck."


Saint Snow
26 June 2014 08:46:17


Best case scenario (not that it will happen of course) is for the buck toothed little prick to be banned from all football for two years and the Dippers being forced to pay his wages while he plays FIFA Manager in his front room, rather than cancelling his contract and letting him walk away for zero value.


Hmmmm, on the other hand, hedge fund crook Henry shows a modicum of morality, cancels the buck toothed little prick's contract and takes an £80m+ hit. That's not a bad scenario either.


Originally Posted by: SEMerc 


 



 


Except a FIFA spokeswoman confirmed yesterday that any ban would only apply to international games.


Obviously I wouldn't rule anything out with FIFA, but extending a ban from international to domestic, for on-field foul play, would be unprecedented and of questionable legality. I'm sure Liverpool's owners would not simply shrug and accept either the possibility of their best player sat kicking his heels for an extended period of time, nor their largest asset having its value severely eroded.


So, looks like the British media's campaign to demonise/unsettle him and drive him out of Liverpool will just have to continue next season.


 



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
Saint Snow
26 June 2014 09:27:59

Luis Suarez quits!


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28030739


 



 


 



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
SEMerc
26 June 2014 09:46:55

Even the kid is wary.


Matty H
26 June 2014 09:52:02
Is that his missus? I would.
Matty H
26 June 2014 09:57:46
Like to munch on her I meant.
Arcus
26 June 2014 10:09:31

Is that his missus? I would.

Originally Posted by: Matty H 


I'd heard that they had been going through difficulties lately and had separated for a while, but now Luis wants her back. And her elbow. And her shoulder.


Ben,
Nr. Easingwold, North Yorkshire
30m asl
Matty H
26 June 2014 10:13:48

Is that his missus? I would.

Originally Posted by: Arcus 


I'd heard that they had been going through difficulties lately and had separated for a while, but now Luis wants her back. And her elbow. And her shoulder.

Originally Posted by: Matty H 



😂
bowser
26 June 2014 12:59:15


Best case scenario (not that it will happen of course) is for the buck toothed little prick to be banned from all football for two years and the Dippers being forced to pay his wages while he plays FIFA Manager in his front room, rather than cancelling his contract and letting him walk away for zero value.


Hmmmm, on the other hand, hedge fund crook Henry shows a modicum of morality, cancels the buck toothed little prick's contract and takes an £80m+ hit. That's not a bad scenario either.


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


 



 


Except a FIFA spokeswoman confirmed yesterday that any ban would only apply to international games.


Obviously I wouldn't rule anything out with FIFA, but extending a ban from international to domestic, for on-field foul play, would be unprecedented and of questionable legality. I'm sure Liverpool's owners would not simply shrug and accept either the possibility of their best player sat kicking his heels for an extended period of time, nor their largest asset having its value severely eroded.


So, looks like the British media's campaign to demonise/unsettle him and drive him out of Liverpool will just have to continue next season.


 

Originally Posted by: SEMerc 



depends if someone wants to prosecute or not. If fifa punishment is seen as too lax by the Italians then maybe legal action is a possibility. Either way, he cant complain - he has been given plenty of chances.
Saint Snow
26 June 2014 13:21:33

Ghana suspend Sulley Muntari and Kevin Prince Boateng, sending them home.


I hear reports that it's about money. After previous issues with not getting paid, and having their budget cut for this world cup, tensions are running high - and yesterday there was a police-escorted armoured van that delivered actual cash to the team hotel to pay the players.


On the one hand, the majority of these players have salaries in excess of £1m a year, so it's hard to have sympathy.


On the other, one suspects that a big wedge of the money paid to the Ghanaian FA from the World Cup will be earmarked by corrupt scrotes to line selective pockets in Ghana.



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
SEMerc
26 June 2014 14:02:22

Suarez banned for nine international matches and for four months from any football activity.


Works out to 9 PL games as he won't be available until end-October.

SEMerc
Saint Snow
26 June 2014 14:21:16



Best case scenario (not that it will happen of course) is for the buck toothed little prick to be banned from all football for two years and the Dippers being forced to pay his wages while he plays FIFA Manager in his front room, rather than cancelling his contract and letting him walk away for zero value.


Hmmmm, on the other hand, hedge fund crook Henry shows a modicum of morality, cancels the buck toothed little prick's contract and takes an £80m+ hit. That's not a bad scenario either.


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


 



 


Except a FIFA spokeswoman confirmed yesterday that any ban would only apply to international games.


Obviously I wouldn't rule anything out with FIFA, but extending a ban from international to domestic, for on-field foul play, would be unprecedented and of questionable legality. I'm sure Liverpool's owners would not simply shrug and accept either the possibility of their best player sat kicking his heels for an extended period of time, nor their largest asset having its value severely eroded.


So, looks like the British media's campaign to demonise/unsettle him and drive him out of Liverpool will just have to continue next season.


 


Originally Posted by: SEMerc 


 


FFS


Thanks, FIFA, just f*ck Liverpool over as well


 



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
SEMerc
26 June 2014 14:26:16




Best case scenario (not that it will happen of course) is for the buck toothed little prick to be banned from all football for two years and the Dippers being forced to pay his wages while he plays FIFA Manager in his front room, rather than cancelling his contract and letting him walk away for zero value.


Hmmmm, on the other hand, hedge fund crook Henry shows a modicum of morality, cancels the buck toothed little prick's contract and takes an £80m+ hit. That's not a bad scenario either.


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


 



 


Except a FIFA spokeswoman confirmed yesterday that any ban would only apply to international games.


Obviously I wouldn't rule anything out with FIFA, but extending a ban from international to domestic, for on-field foul play, would be unprecedented and of questionable legality. I'm sure Liverpool's owners would not simply shrug and accept either the possibility of their best player sat kicking his heels for an extended period of time, nor their largest asset having its value severely eroded.


So, looks like the British media's campaign to demonise/unsettle him and drive him out of Liverpool will just have to continue next season.


 


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


 


FFS


Thanks, FIFA, just f*ck Liverpool over as well


 


Originally Posted by: SEMerc 


Time for the hedge fund crook to cash in methinks.

Kev71
26 June 2014 14:30:35

Stop blaming FIFA and the Media, if Suarez didn't bite anyone he wouldn't get a ban. Suarez is the only one to blame, nobody else.

SEMerc
26 June 2014 14:36:39

[​IMG]

SEMerc
26 June 2014 14:44:49

If the ban on football related activities includes registration, then that means the buck toothed prick won't be playing any CL football. Anywhere.


Unless he is transferred, which FIFA have clarified is possible.

Brian Gaze
26 June 2014 14:58:02

A lenient penalty IMO and no mention as far as I'm aware of a requirement for him to seek psychiatric help. On the plus side he is now a proven serial biter and his market value is likely to be reduced significantly. 


Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
Saint Snow
26 June 2014 15:03:36


Stop blaming FIFA and the Media, if Suarez didn't bite anyone he wouldn't get a ban. Suarez is the only one to blame, nobody else.


Originally Posted by: Kev71 


 


If they'd have banned him from international football for 12/18/24 months, I wouldn't have given a toss.


But, when he'd previously been banned at club level, this ban didn't extend to international football and he did indeed play for Uruguay when banned at club level.


No other player, when banned for foul play on the football pitch when partaking in an international, has ever had the ban extended from the international game to their club. There is no precedent for this.


 


Liverpool have released a statement: "Liverpool Football Club will wait until we have seen and had time to review the FIFA Disciplinary Committee report before making any further comment."


I can see us taking this on the chin, but so want them to challenge this, through CAS is necessary


 



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
SEMerc
26 June 2014 15:08:21



Stop blaming FIFA and the Media, if Suarez didn't bite anyone he wouldn't get a ban. Suarez is the only one to blame, nobody else.


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


 


If they'd have banned him from international football for 12/18/24 months, I wouldn't have given a toss.


But, when he'd previously been banned at club level, this ban didn't extend to international football and he did indeed play for Uruguay when banned at club level.


No other player, when banned for foul play on the football pitch when partaking in an international, has ever had the ban extended from the international game to their club. There is no precedent for this.


 


Liverpool have released a statement: "Liverpool Football Club will wait until we have seen and had time to review the FIFA Disciplinary Committee report before making any further comment."


I can see us taking this on the chin, but so want them to challenge this, through CAS is necessary


 


Originally Posted by: Kev71 


I can see you offloading him too.

haghir22
26 June 2014 15:13:18

34 games banned and not one red card.


I'm obviously disappointed, as I do think the punishment is unfair on Liverpool, however it was our choice to stick with him the last time. I know the precedent is international bans to be international and domestic to be domestic but FIFA had no choice really.


I can't explain what its like to have the most wonderful player at your club, a joy to watch and a genius who single handedly could win your club trophies, and yet deep inside you know you are best rid of. Its so odd and just completes a bloody hollow feeling in my stomach following a really shitty end to the season that promised so much.


YNWA
SEMerc
26 June 2014 15:19:28


34 games banned and not one red card.


I'm obviously disappointed, as I do think the punishment is unfair on Liverpool, however it was our choice to stick with him the last time. I know the precedent is international bans to be international and domestic to be domestic but FIFA had no choice really.


I can't explain what its like to have the most wonderful player at your club, a joy to watch and a genius who single handedly could win your club trophies, and yet deep inside you know you are best rid of. Its so odd and just completes a bloody hollow feeling in my stomach following a really shitty end to the season that promised so much.


Originally Posted by: haghir22 


Quite. You might have been able to put up an argument if it was a first offence. Arguably, it's his fourth, if you include the ban for abusing Evra.


Eventually, Suarez will learn, whether he sees a shrink or not.


This might help.


Saint Snow
26 June 2014 15:19:35

I get football rivalry, but the barely-disguised hatred some people have for Liverpool surprises me. We're the David, against the moneybags Goliaths of Chavski, Citeh & Man-U.


 



 


 



Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
SEMerc
26 June 2014 15:21:21


I get football rivalry, but the barely-disguised hatred some people have for Liverpool surprises me. We're the David, against the moneybags Goliaths of Chavski, Citeh & Man-U.


 



 


 


Originally Posted by: Saint Snow 


I think this post requires a fishing rod with a candle dangling on the end.

Remove ads from site

Ads