I'm not entirely convinced a finer resolution leads to a more accurate outcome as a not insignificant factor is the quality of data input.
Also SC should that grid be a data cube in m3
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser
Improvements occur with the thermodynamics and the like, meaning better representation of convection, but there is a fundamental limit to how accurate the models can be regarding where small scale features are at specific times, so we can never realistically expect an accurate prediction for then there will be a shower at Wimbledon, for example.
Frontal features tend to verify better, but the exact timing remains a target behind bulletproof glass.
Regarding the grid, there is a vertical element - I was just referring to the distance latitudinally in my earlier post.
Having said that, the resolution is considred to be 200m2 with 140 vertical levels - twice what the operational UKV model has, as this was needed to prevent erroneous tendencies that were observed in earlier studies, such as excessive cell development and organisation - though my study found evidence to suggest that this wasn't entirely eradicated.
Originally Posted by: nsrobins