Yes, it did:
http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/gfse_cartes.php?jour=5&mois=12&annee=2012&heure=0&archive=1&mode=0&ech=6&runpara=0&carte=1
That's the archive of the GFS charts from the time. It was dependent on the Siberian high migrating westwards enough to link with the Azores High, which in the event didn't happen. Instead, the Atlantic fired up enough to stop the link, meaning we ended up with mush.
The difference this time is that we've had two reversals in the stratosphere, the third starting imminently, so there's less emphasis on westwards momentum aloft. In 2012 there had been no reversals and a warming was just starting - but as you'll know from looking at the charts, that implies a strong vortex to our west or NW.
https://www.netweather.tv/forum/topic/74587-stratosphere-temperature-watch-20122013/page/45/
(A link to the stratospheric discussions at the time).
So - despite the models gunning for some westwards movement, linking us to that Siberian High, the stratosphere was completely against it - like pushing a boulder up a mountain.
This time at least we have conditions aloft in a much more conducive state.
None of this precludes this current cross-model agreement (again, ensembles) from being wrong, it may very well be, but it is a different set up entirely to what we saw in 2012.
Time will tell!
Originally Posted by: Retron