Remove ads from site

ARTzeman
30 December 2013 09:06:50

Thank you for the output Martin..


Know what to expect for most of the month now...






Some people walk in the rain.
Others just get wet.
I Just Blow my horn or trumpet
Karl Guille
30 December 2013 09:07:23
Ever the optimist I too see the next chance of cold, and it is no more than a chance at the moment, in 10 days time as per the ECM 00z. Of course it is totally reliant on that slight break in the Atlantic Train as without it the barrage of westerlies will just roll on and on! The other positive is the lowering of 850s on the GEFS in the same time period and whilst I have yet to look at the individual runs, there appear to be 4 or 5 at the T240 period that attempt some sort of easterly. Small crumbs of comfort perhaps, but crumbs nonetheless!
St. Sampson
Guernsey
Retron
30 December 2013 09:13:14

. Personally, I don't pay attention to what the strat may or may not do in 384 hours time.

Originally Posted by: Whether Idle 


It's always worth keeping an eye on. At the moment the forecasts show the vortex taking a hammering in just over a week's time and the pummelling continues through the next week. If nothing else, it ought to ease the zonal train just a notch as it works its way downwards!


 


Leysdown, north Kent
Karl Guille
30 December 2013 09:16:50
Hmm, 6 and 17 are the only GEFS runs on the 00z to form an easterly with 1,9 and 20 as also rans!
St. Sampson
Guernsey
Retron
30 December 2013 09:17:39
Reposted from NW - this explains the Met Office's text forecasts mention cold. As I suspected a couple of days ago, it's not related to the GLOSEA stratosphere model:

http://forum.netweather.tv/topic/78787-model-output-discussion-17th-dec2013-12z-onwards/page-96#entry2878659 

Yesterday, 23:18

bluearmy, on 29 Dec 2013 - 23:00, said:

Any word on the 30 day 'cold possibility' Ian? Is it glosea 4 or potential cold clusters at day 15?


The latter I believe. Nothing to scare the horses re cold (in strictest sense) until at least mid-Jan, reckon UKMO, but frankly the fixation for now is understandably on rainfall & (to some degree) wind issues for the forseeable. High confidence on the unsettled westerly regime through early to (at least) mid-Jan, but with Pm or rPm phases causing the cooling trend seen in EC ENS... snow/heavy snow for Scotland at times but Exeter stress range of synoptic outcomes into further reaches of trend period, thus confidence declining later into Jan. So, all in keeping with current output available on public websites.
Leysdown, north Kent
bledur
30 December 2013 09:39:03

The latter I believe. Nothing to scare the horses re cold (in strictest sense) until at least mid-Jan, reckon UKMO, but frankly the fixation for now is understandably on rainfall & (to some degree) wind issues for the forseeable. High confidence on the unsettled westerly regime through early to (at least) mid-Jan, but with Pm or rPm phases causing the cooling trend seen in EC ENS... snow/heavy snow for Scotland at times but Exeter stress range of synoptic outcomes into further reaches of trend period, thus confidence declining later into Jan. So, all in keeping with current output available on public websites.


 yes in the short to medium term the weather is stuck in a mobile atlantic flow. after around the 11th of jan there are signs of a marked dip in temps and an easterly or north easterly flow setting in . not really cold, but a lot colder than recently . long way off , but it is a feasible resolution.

Gooner
30 December 2013 09:49:09

Q's fvourite model NAVGEM really gets the warming going


http://modeles.meteociel.fr/modeles/navgem/runs/2013123000/navgemnh-7-180.png?30-06


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Charmhills
30 December 2013 10:02:29

Very unsettled and often wet with a risk of flooding continues.


Staying that way well into FI.


Loughborough, EM.

Knowledge is power, ignorance is weakness.

Duane.
nickl
30 December 2013 10:09:51

Reposted from NW - this explains the Met Office's text forecasts mention cold. As I suspected a couple of days ago, it's not related to the GLOSEA stratosphere model:

http://forum.netweather.tv/topic/78787-model-output-discussion-17th-dec2013-12z-onwards/page-96#entry2878659

Yesterday, 23:18

bluearmy, on 29 Dec 2013 - 23:00, said:

Any word on the 30 day 'cold possibility' Ian? Is it glosea 4 or potential cold clusters at day 15?


The latter I believe. Nothing to scare the horses re cold (in strictest sense) until at least mid-Jan, reckon UKMO, but frankly the fixation for now is understandably on rainfall & (to some degree) wind issues for the forseeable. High confidence on the unsettled westerly regime through early to (at least) mid-Jan, but with Pm or rPm phases causing the cooling trend seen in EC ENS... snow/heavy snow for Scotland at times but Exeter stress range of synoptic outcomes into further reaches of trend period, thus confidence declining later into Jan. So, all in keeping with current output available on public websites.

Originally Posted by: Retron 


glad you found that darren - i was about to reference it.


much uncertainty around day 8-12 re the mid atlantic ridging. until we get a handle on that, not much point in making predictions as the subsequent surface conditions for us vary hugely.  also, can we not bother to look at navgem's strat charts - the model clearly has no definition or resolution that high up. 

Gooner
30 December 2013 10:17:43


Reposted from NW - this explains the Met Office's text forecasts mention cold. As I suspected a couple of days ago, it's not related to the GLOSEA stratosphere model:

http://forum.netweather.tv/topic/78787-model-output-discussion-17th-dec2013-12z-onwards/page-96#entry2878659

Yesterday, 23:18

bluearmy, on 29 Dec 2013 - 23:00, said:

Any word on the 30 day 'cold possibility' Ian? Is it glosea 4 or potential cold clusters at day 15?


The latter I believe. Nothing to scare the horses re cold (in strictest sense) until at least mid-Jan, reckon UKMO, but frankly the fixation for now is understandably on rainfall & (to some degree) wind issues for the forseeable. High confidence on the unsettled westerly regime through early to (at least) mid-Jan, but with Pm or rPm phases causing the cooling trend seen in EC ENS... snow/heavy snow for Scotland at times but Exeter stress range of synoptic outcomes into further reaches of trend period, thus confidence declining later into Jan. So, all in keeping with current output available on public websites.

Originally Posted by: nickl 


glad you found that darren - i was about to reference it.


much uncertainty around day 8-12 re the mid atlantic ridging. until we get a handle on that, not much point in making predictions as the subsequent surface conditions for us vary hugely.  also, can we not bother to look at navgem's strat charts - the model clearly has no definition or resolution that high up. 


Originally Posted by: Retron 


Why do you say that ?


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Rob K
30 December 2013 10:30:11
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1561.png 
Yateley, NE Hampshire, 73m asl
"But who wants to be foretold the weather? It is bad enough when it comes, without our having the misery of knowing about it beforehand." — Jerome K. Jerome
Gooner
30 December 2013 10:30:43

http://modeles.meteociel.fr/modeles/gfs/runs/2013123006/gfsnh-0-174.png?6


Blimey another one to batter the North


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Hungry Tiger
30 December 2013 10:34:00


http://modeles.meteociel.fr/modeles/gfs/runs/2013123006/gfsnh-0-174.png?6


Blimey another one to batter the North


Originally Posted by: Gooner 



That's been showing up for a few days now.


Looks seriously rough and also looks like this might verify.


 


 


Gavin S. FRmetS.
TWO Moderator.
Contact the TWO team - [email protected]
South Cambridgeshire. 93 metres or 302.25 feet ASL.


Rob K
30 December 2013 10:40:33
That low stays more or less stationary for 72 hours and gradually fills in situ.

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.png 

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2921.png 

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2281.png 

Serious rainfall!
Yateley, NE Hampshire, 73m asl
"But who wants to be foretold the weather? It is bad enough when it comes, without our having the misery of knowing about it beforehand." — Jerome K. Jerome
Phil G
30 December 2013 10:42:53
Next Monday's storm has been modelled closer to the UK compared to the 0z
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.png 
ITSY
30 December 2013 10:45:57

in amidst all the storminess, the vortex look under massive pressure in low res, and by +264 looks like its heading for a split (on the 06z).

edit: AND heyho, wouldn't you know it, we have a split in the stratospheric vortex!


idj20
30 December 2013 10:47:29


http://modeles.meteociel.fr/modeles/gfs/runs/2013123006/gfsnh-0-174.png?6


Blimey another one to batter the North


Originally Posted by: Gooner 



*Sigh*. Has GFS been on the red bull again? In the last run, it didn't look that bad off to the west of the UK:

The 0Z run: http://www.weatheronline.co.uk/cgi-bin/expertcharts?LANG=en&CONT=ukuk&MODELL=gfs&MODELLTYP=1&VAR=uv10&WMO=&ZOOM=0&RES=0&PERIOD=&PANEL=0&ARCHIV=0&BASE=201312300000%26HH%3D168

And now in the latest run, a horror show: http://www.weatheronline.co.uk/cgi-bin/expertcharts?LANG=en&MENU=0000000000&CONT=ukuk&MODELL=gfs&MODELLTYP=1&VAR=uv10&HH=168&PANEL=0&ZOOM=0&WMO=

Is it trying to give us weather watchers bloody heart attacks?! Here we go again with hoping for downgrades in the next few runs - or I could just turn off the internet and get on with my life.
  I mis the old days when I used to be blissfully unaware of it and took each day as they came along.

However, this may soothe our frayed nerves, even though at 324 hrs it is light years away in forecasting terms: http://www.weatheronline.co.uk/cgi-bin/expertcharts?LANG=en&MENU=0000000000&CONT=ukuk&MODELL=gfs&MODELLTYP=1&BASE=-&VAR=pslv&HH=324&ZOOM=0&ARCHIV=0&RES=0&WMO=&PERIOD= Aaaaah, that's better. And relax.

Oh no, I'm becoming a model output monster.


Folkestone Harbour. 
Rob K
30 December 2013 10:51:17
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn3242.png 

Looks like the residual chunk of PV over Canada/Greenland could keep the UK on the mild side though.


Yateley, NE Hampshire, 73m asl
"But who wants to be foretold the weather? It is bad enough when it comes, without our having the misery of knowing about it beforehand." — Jerome K. Jerome
Gooner
30 December 2013 10:53:06


http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn3242.png 

Looks like the residual chunk of PV over Canada/Greenland could keep the UK on the mild side though.


Originally Posted by: Rob K 


http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn37217.png


chilly enough though Rob


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


nickl
30 December 2013 10:58:29



 also, can we not bother to look at navgem's strat charts - the model clearly has no definition or resolution that high up. 


Originally Posted by: Gooner 


Why do you say that ?


Originally Posted by: nickl 


cos its clearly got no idea what its doing marcus.

Sevendust
30 December 2013 11:26:17




 also, can we not bother to look at navgem's strat charts - the model clearly has no definition or resolution that high up. 


Originally Posted by: nickl 


Why do you say that ?


Originally Posted by: Gooner 


cos its clearly got no idea what its doing marcus.


Originally Posted by: nickl 


nouska
30 December 2013 12:44:34
I've already posted a paper on the January '63 SSW which has some similarities to what is being modelled. A squint at the upper air analogues show '79 and 63 as being upstream matches; both events saw a split vortex following elongation from wave 2 activity.

For anyone interested in looking at past warmings there are animations available here.

http://p-martineau.com/ssw-animations/ 
Gooner
30 December 2013 13:01:55




 also, can we not bother to look at navgem's strat charts - the model clearly has no definition or resolution that high up. 


Originally Posted by: nickl 


Why do you say that ?


Originally Posted by: Gooner 


cos its clearly got no idea what its doing marcus.


Originally Posted by: nickl 



thought you had some stats


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Gavin P
30 December 2013 13:34:00

Hi all,


Here's todays video update;


Rain, rain and more rain...


http://www.gavsweathervids.com


Also has a look at the latest stratospheric forecast from the GFS model.


Rural West Northants 120m asl
Short, medium and long range weather forecast videos @ https://www.youtube.com/user/GavsWeatherVids
polarwind
30 December 2013 13:50:50

I remember Tom Pressuti, only four? years ago, making weather predictions based on SSW events and often being the focus for   ridicule by some. He wouldn't be ridiculed now.


Four years is a long time in climate science progress - I wonder how much more there is to know, reduce to algorithms, include in the weather models for these to become reliable and in the GCM's for these to be useful?


 


"The professional standards of science must impose a framework of discipline and at the same time encourage rebellion against it". – Michael Polyani (1962)
"If climate science is sound and accurate, then it should be able to respond effectively to all the points raised…." - Grandad
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts". - Bertrand Russell
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
"A consensus means that everyone agrees to say collectively what no one believes individually.”- Abba Eban, Israeli diplomat
Dave,Derby
Users browsing this topic

Remove ads from site

Ads