GFS and GFSP being persistent with two opportunities for amplification to produce a more interesting few days of weather, one 8th-10th December and the other 10th-14th December.
It also seems that only one of those opportunities can be realised, with no single run showing both of them leading to results.
The 12z runs power the jet through 8th-10th December, but make more of the second opportunity, with a brief Scandi High and cold easterly from the GFS 12z op before a deep Atlantic trough plows the road, and among the most promising (and believable) northerlies from the 12z GFSP op run:
This GFSP run has the weakest area of low heights to our NW of any run in the past few days, though it has tended to lean towards this more than GFS.
The real benefit form a setup like the above is the sledgehammer blow to the strat. vortex.
This is to my eyes a classic situation from many winters 2008-2012/13, in which GFS persistently hints at a ridge across Greenland, which eventually moves into nearer timeframes and quite often gets upgraded... or at least, that's how it worked with the old GFS. In this case we have GFSP offering the persistent signal while GFS keeps powering up Atlantic storms in the western North Atlantic.
Is it the old GFS' Atlantic jet stream positive strength bias? Maybe, but at the moment there's not enough model output to the contrary for this to be much more than hopeful speculation. After all, ECM went nuts with the storm intensity days 9-10 this morning, which lends little confidence to that model's efforts either.
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser