Believe it or not we will actually come within a hair's breadth of a major split in the polar vortex and subsequent disintegration during the next 7-10 days, only falling a little short of the wave activity required to achieve it. With a little more luck, the stratosphere-based outlooks issued way back in November would have proved very close to the mark in terms of a SSW taking place.
What the models show instead is the lower vortex being able to just about hold on before re-grouping from around 8 days time onward, initially centered over Scandinavia before scooting over to Greenland as a new wave of lower-strat. warming progresses from the Atlantic to Scandinavia and then on through Asia.
Of late, strat. changes at 30hPa have been reflected in the troposphere very quickly, and the models show this continuing to be the case, with a sharp increase in the westerlies on our side of the hemisphere days 8-12. It could become very stormy across much of the UK for a time, as the jet looks to be tracking south of normal due in part to the polar vortex being at below normal strength. It depends on whether the main focus of these westerlies is across the UK as per recent GFSP runs (which have looked fearsome at times) or in the western Atlantic as has been a feature of recent ECM op runs days 9-10.
Speaking of that model, it has also been making more of a mid-Atlantic ridge in a week's time, as has UKMO based on day 6 output, and both GFS and GFSP have trended strongly towards that on their 12z op runs. There looks to be another one of those transient northerly/northeasterly opportunities associated with this feature, if it is able to exploit what looks to be a very brief polar vortex split followed by a rapid recovery.
Way up at the top of the stratosphere, the second attempt at a 'killer-blow' warming has started to appear on recent ECM runs, starting off in NE Canada and progressing through Greenland. With the vortex in a weaker state prior to this one's impact, it's hard to imagine that this second attempt would be unable to take it down - but the timescale for this is unclear at the moment, and in any case, GFS doesn't seem so keen on this new warming (based on a lack of analysis of that model's output on the other site).
I know it's a trying process this - simple fact is, when there's going to be a 'close but no cigar' moment, it's a lot easier to go through when you're not aware of the cigar in the first place
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser