I'm beginning to think the propensity of the media to distort reality for the purpose of increasing revenue or page traffic (see The Daily Express and the ever reliable Exa**a Weather) is not only creeping into more mainstream forecasting outlets but affecting the coverage of what's actually happening.
This event is significant - I do not dispute that - but it isn't actually that unusual. A 'nor'easter' of this magnitude occurs roughly once every four years and as recently as 2006 a winter storm affecting the whole NE USA region dumped 40" in Virginia and was directly responsible for over 100 fatalities:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_blizzard_of_1996
But of course, promoting this particular storm as 'a rather nasty snowstorm of typical magnitude based on recent climatology' doesn't sell copy like 'Snowzilla to bury New York' does, but we shouldn't let facts get in the way.
Originally Posted by: nsrobins