Originally Posted by: KevBrads1
More potential there than Steve Murr's New Years Eve farce. At least we can see the models are showing potential rather than based on someone's wishful thinking...
Originally Posted by: Robertski
Agree a bit harsh though I suspect it probably wasn't meant how it sounds, I enjoy reading posts from Stormchaser, Brian, Retron, Steve M and other seasoned posters on here as it has really helped me understand a lot more about how to read ensembles, trends etc than I did before and I am still learning! Steve M wrote as he saw it which was a chance of a good easterly at the time - yes he likes the snow as do a lot of us, so he was just saying what I would imagine a lot of us would hope would happen.
However it wasn't just a cold ramp - some good synoptic/scientific points he put in there to back it up which might have come off, but as we all know models and easterly's don't go together well and it is rare for an easterly to have just the right synoptics e.g. March 2013 , Jan 87 and Feb 91 etc. Unfortunately it didn't come together and most of the UK was not affected though if you were in the Shetland islands you may disagree! It was a close thing though - bottom line is all posters please do continue posting your analysis as it is an interesting read and one of the reasons I only read this weather forum and no other, would be a shame if people are put off posting due to comments from other members.
Anyway back on topic and a big upgrade from GFS this morning though ECM FI still troublesome as Brian mentioned - would be good if that falls in line on the next run. Expect many swings back and forth from cold though as I am not sure the models have this properly sorted out just yet, hopefully the colder theme will become a stronger feature even more so by the weekend we will see.
Edited by user
06 January 2016 07:55:52
|
Reason: Not specified