Remove ads from site

Saint Snow
03 February 2016 09:46:38


In essence what we have is variations on a theme of a mobile pattern at the moment with the jet a little further south.


Originally Posted by: Gandalf The White 


 


Just not enough 'further south'




Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
picturesareme
03 February 2016 09:50:28


 


Only the MetO themselves will decide that, Ian, and not any of us here.


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


So erm I'm wondering.. What happened to this apparent snow event Saturday that the metoffice & BBC were apparently saying yesterday would effect us even as far south as southern England??


For the record here I don't recall seeing such a forecast, but others on here did, and they decided to give Shropshire some unworthy stick for saying the opposit because the models didn't show it.  

Phil24
03 February 2016 09:57:36


 


Is what is being shown by Berlin a SSW event in your estimation, Maunder? Or just a stratospheric warming?


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


Normally an SSW event can be confirmed around 1 week before its effects are felt, though they can be forecast a few weeks beforehand.  It really depends on how strong the waves are moving west when pushing against the easterlies in the stratosphere.  As we all know the western push can't go further east when it hits the eastern winds so it forces these eastern winds down into the troposphere, which is were our weather lives.


Its at this point where the unknowns are, as at this precise moment no one knows how strong this western influence is going to be (albeit some believe the el Nino will make it quite potent).  What we do know is that a potential SSW is about to take place and its effects will become more apparent in the next few days.


Maybe just a passing few cooler days or a change to something much more interesting, we at this point just don't know.  Anyone saying something to the contrary is plucking at straws for what ever they favour is.


 

Maunder Minimum
03 February 2016 10:07:21


 


Is what is being shown by Berlin a SSW event in your estimation, Maunder? Or just a stratospheric warming?


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


I am afraid I have no idea. All I can see is that the warming is major as shown by forecast. Naturally, it does not guarantee that any pattern change will bring sustained cold to our shores, but I am pretty sure it will mean a pattern change of some kind. I think it will end the relentless zonality down the line, but if we end up on the "wrong" side of the result, we could end up warm and dry instead of cold and dry. So long as it is dry and settled, I won't be complaining.


 


New world order coming.
David M Porter
03 February 2016 10:08:54


 


Normally an SSW event can be confirmed around 1 week before its effects are felt, though they can be forecast a few weeks beforehand.  It really depends on how strong the waves are moving west when pushing against the easterlies in the stratosphere.  As we all know the western push can't go further east when it hits the eastern winds so it forces these eastern winds down into the troposphere, which is were our weather lives.


Its at this point where the unknowns are, as at this precise moment no one knows how strong this western influence is going to be (albeit some believe the el Nino will make it quite potent).  What we do know is that a potential SSW is about to take place and its effects will become more apparent in the next few days.


Maybe just a passing few cooler days or a change to something much more interesting, we at this point just don't know.  Anyone saying something to the contrary is plucking at straws for what ever they favour is.


 


Originally Posted by: Phil24 


Thanks Phil.


Let's hope that, assuming the potential SSW takes place as forecast, that it is of some benefit to us in terms of changing the pattern. A change to colder & mostly dry would suit me to be honest after such a wet winter. We need a dry spell more than we need a whole lot of snow, although I know that no doubt others will disagree!


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
Phil24
03 February 2016 10:34:04


 


Thanks Phil.


Let's hope that, assuming the potential SSW takes place as forecast, that it is of some benefit to us in terms of changing the pattern. A change to colder & mostly dry would suit me to be honest after such a wet winter. We need a dry spell more than we need a whole lot of snow, although I know that no doubt others will disagree!


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


Hi David.  One thing is for sure, if it does take place it will have an effect on our weather.  It always does (its the does bit which is uncertain) however historically it tends to lead to a cooler if not much colder weather pattern.

Sinky1970
03 February 2016 10:56:48
That 06Z GFS mid-Feb chart is truly awful.
Chunky Pea
03 February 2016 10:57:04


For the record here I don't recall seeing such a forecast, but others on here did, and they decided to give Shropshire some unworthy stick for saying the opposit because the models didn't show it.  


Originally Posted by: picturesareme 


 


Indeed, it is curious. Only last week I recall when the UKMO, and to and extent, the ECM op showed another potential cold snap for around this period, the GFS was once again slammed 'en masse' for not really buying into it, by keeping the pattern more or less zonal. It never ceases to amaze me how selective peoples' thought processes can be.


Back on topic, the EPS run this morn seems to have a brief opportunity for a weak ridge to develop over the NE Atlantic around the 14th, but the main theme remains zonal right out to day 15 at least.


Current Conditions
https://t.ly/MEYqg 


"You don't have to know anything to have an opinion"
--Roger P, 12/Oct/2022
The Beast from the East
03 February 2016 11:23:10

http://modeles7.meteociel.fr/modeles/gens/runs/2016020306/gens-0-1-192.png


GFS control is better


 


"We have some alternative facts for you"
Kelly-Ann Conway - special adviser to the President
Brian Gaze
03 February 2016 11:45:28
I've just removed a couple of posts. Please stay on topic. If you have an issue discuss directly with the mods instead of taking this thread further off topic.
Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
Gooner
03 February 2016 11:57:45


http://modeles7.meteociel.fr/modeles/gens/runs/2016020306/gens-0-1-192.png


GFS control is better


 


Originally Posted by: The Beast from the East 


It is much better and shows that a block in a favourable location is not impossible


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


David M Porter
03 February 2016 14:09:02

Having just read the MetO's update for the latter part of Feb on their website and noted the change in forecast from yesterday, I can only conclude that at the moment, the signals they are seeing for late February from their available information are somewhat mixed to say the least. There has at times been a fair bit of flip-flopping in their 16-30 day updates of late, not least over the past few days.


My suspicion is that this much anticipated stratospheric warming (possibly sudden) may be causing the models some issues. It seems to be that as things stand, things are rather finely balanced between a continuation of the unsettled spell and a change to something drier & colder later this month. Given that we're only three days into February, forecasts for late February are in deepest FI territory just now.


Lenzie, Glasgow

"Let us not take ourselves too seriously. None of us has a monopoly on wisdom, and we must always be ready to listen and respect other points of view."- Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022
Brian Gaze
03 February 2016 14:20:00
Most people were hoping an SSW would lead to HLB and a genuine cold spell rather than cooler zonality. The latest Met Office update suggests even the latter outcome is questionable now. In addition, at no time have the official Met Office updates even suggested the possibility of the former.
Brian Gaze
Berkhamsted
TWO Buzz - get the latest news and views 
"I'm not socialist, I know that. I don't believe in sharing my money." - Gary Numan
Gooner
03 February 2016 14:21:14


Having just read the MetO's update for the latter part of Feb on their website and noted the change in forecast from yesterday, I can only conclude that at the moment, the signals they are seeing for late February from their available information are somewhat mixed to say the least. There has at times been a fair bit of flip-flopping in their 16-30 day updates of late, not least over the past few days.


My suspicion is that this much anticipated stratospheric warming (possibly sudden) may be causing the models some issues. It seems to be that as things stand, things are rather finely balanced between a continuation of the unsettled spell and a change to something drier & colder later this month. Given that we're only three days into February, forecasts for late February are in deepest FI territory just now.


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


Spot on and if anyone on here is taking the 2nd half of the forecast as gospel..........................ROFL more fool you . It will change and fluctuate ............people know that or should do


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


The Beast from the East
03 February 2016 14:30:36

Rather shambolic end to another winter. Now everything depends on the SSW to radically alter the background signals. This is it. All our money on the Black!


 


"We have some alternative facts for you"
Kelly-Ann Conway - special adviser to the President
Phil24
03 February 2016 14:37:08


Having just read the MetO's update for the latter part of Feb on their website and noted the change in forecast from yesterday, I can only conclude that at the moment, the signals they are seeing for late February from their available information are somewhat mixed to say the least. There has at times been a fair bit of flip-flopping in their 16-30 day updates of late, not least over the past few days.


My suspicion is that this much anticipated stratospheric warming (possibly sudden) may be causing the models some issues. It seems to be that as things stand, things are rather finely balanced between a continuation of the unsettled spell and a change to something drier & colder later this month. Given that we're only three days into February, forecasts for late February are in deepest FI territory just now.


Originally Posted by: David M Porter 


They can only work with what they see.  Their own reasoning with regards to the effect of SSW, is to work its effects into the forecast no earlier than one week before its predicted.  So its no surprise to see the current extended outlook as it is, that is sensible forecasting of the facts as they see them right now.  However if this current SSW is to take place as we currently believe then expect to see some changes to the Met outlook from Monday, if not then you can assume with some fair confidence that it won't have any effect at all.


I think its a very good sensible call from the Meto, but don't forget it also gives them a lot of room to manoeuvre to a cold option based on the unpredictable effects of this possible event.

Stormchaser
03 February 2016 15:33:08

I have contacted Fergie in the hope of some explanation as to why the trend toward an MJO driven change has suddenly vanished from GloSea5. It has been by far the most dependable signal from the likes of ECM and UKM with respect to shaking things up late in the month and going into March.


As for the strat. I'm not as surprised, but given that it has been looking better on this morning's GFS output with the vortex getting locked in over Siberia rather than drifting back toward Greenland, it still seems rather strange. Bear in mind this is from a scientific perspective as I'm not keen on late Feb/early March cold, unless it's exceptional which is always a long shot.


Possible explanations include the North Atlantic Cold Pool driving stronger zonal tendencies. Hopefully he will be able to shed at least a little light on things - I know there's a lot of red tape or whatever.


If you have any problems or queries relating to TWO you can Email [email protected]

https://twitter.com/peacockreports 
2023's Homeland Extremes:
T-Max: 30.2°C 9th Sep (...!) | T-Min: -7.1°C 22nd & 23rd Jan | Wettest Day: 25.9mm 2nd Nov | Ice Days: 1 (2nd Dec -1.3°C in freezing fog)
Keep Calm and Forecast On
Stormchaser
03 February 2016 15:45:28

In the meantime, plenty to be keeping an eye on...



This higher-resolution ICON model hints that Saturday's secondary low might extend further south than the 'big three' have been suggesting. 


ARPEGE went with that with yesterday's 12z effort and this was the outcome across the UK:



...however it has since moved back north. Long story short, the track is uncertain enough that the peak inland wind gust strength could be anything between 50 and 70 mph and the location anywhere from S. Scotland to S. England!


Generally, the tracks further south produce the strongest winds, as the feature remains separate from the parent low for longer; as it merges, the movement toward the core of the trough lessens the pressure gradient.


 


The bigger story still looks likely to be the Sun-Tue storm, though. GFS and NAVGEM are the only models I can find that don't develop a very deep low S. of Greenland by early Sunday which is the prerequisite for a heavy impact on the UK - though the UKMO 00z suggests that it could peak just before reaching us, which I expect would keep the peak wind gusts out of the 70-80 mph range for all but a few particularly exposed locations.


'Hold on to your hats' may not cut it...!


If you have any problems or queries relating to TWO you can Email [email protected]

https://twitter.com/peacockreports 
2023's Homeland Extremes:
T-Max: 30.2°C 9th Sep (...!) | T-Min: -7.1°C 22nd & 23rd Jan | Wettest Day: 25.9mm 2nd Nov | Ice Days: 1 (2nd Dec -1.3°C in freezing fog)
Keep Calm and Forecast On
Maunder Minimum
03 February 2016 15:50:40

Please! I will be so very happy if Shropshire is proved to be 100% wrong. I still have confidence in the SSW to deliver. We shall see!


New world order coming.
Russwirral
03 February 2016 16:23:44

The output over the last 48hrs continues to improve massively.

Lots of wintry potential, even for southerners - we are all in this together. Dont be put off by the rainfall charts. Indeed - a wet cold scenario is a great one to have in this setup. Those LPs could dart anywhere, with cold air to the north, and a favourable wind directions we could be in for snowy spells in short notice once Saturday is out of the way- quite literally anywhere.

Great to see.


warrenb
03 February 2016 16:26:56
This winter was inevitable, cold pool in north atlantic and El Nino, only one outcome. Rain and wind.
Arcus
03 February 2016 17:35:39

12z Control looks like fun for the South with a double whammy on Mon then Wed:



 


 



 


Ben,
Nr. Easingwold, North Yorkshire
30m asl
LA2B MeridFlowEuro09
03 February 2016 17:36:24

Model Output GFS and UKMO here we come...


😆😀💦🌌😃.


NE USA to Mid SE USA PV Low, snow heavy on the north end, with bursts of heavy rain and SSW winds, Cyclonic NNE of New York, East Canada etc.  PV Low from between Newfoundland and SW Greenland is to affect North and mid to Central NE Atlantic, NE USA system catches on its SW section and cross Newfoundland NW Atlantic and then by Saturday evening and night to Sunday Midday crosses UK bringing cold weather back across.


By then Windy South with heavy blustery showers, chance in Scotland and NE and Central UK for some snowfall from the secondary Low, the Low that is ahead of it cross North Atlantic in front across Iceland and then across NE N Mid Atlantic and Arctic sea to our north.


Monday the NW Atlantic Low merges with the two ahead SE and NE of it merged but UK turns very cold in NW and North on Sunday and during Monday7th and 8th February 2016, Cold West NW flow for whole UK but just near average temps in South and SW UK on Sunday, with a North South divide on Monday, this colder weather affects Central UK on Monday as well.


Large pool of cold Maritime polar mixed with to the south some tropical polar maritime airmass south of maritime polar.


On Tuesday drier in the NW and South, with Low Pressure areas in Mid And far North Atlantic, and over to Central and North NE UK with still cold weather Cyclonic weather and wintry showers over UK, it looks like further Cold Low Pressure withNNW airflow by Wednesday is likely.


😀😏🌧☁️😄😟❄️☔️💫⚡️🌫.


 


Climate is warming up, Scotland and N Ireland and North England still often gets some Winter frost, ice and snow, November to March, but the SE and South UK including S Central England and Wales, together with the West and North through the year, they sometimes get more rain than London and S SE England, where some longer dry fine spells without much heavy rain is seen every year.

The North Atlantic Sea often gets some much Colder Wintry conditions from November to March Months, and Mild SW and South winds tend to be more frequent over the East and SE of North Atlantic Sea, as the Azores High tends to stay in charge. 

With this warmth and heat, the Central and South UK has become mostly free of snow and frost.
Shropshire
03 February 2016 18:00:51
I highlighted it in bold Lazy !
From December 27th 2020, zonality will be banned from mixing with the UK. We appreciate that this may come as a shock to younger people and old Uncle Barty. This ban will last for a minimum of ten days.
Gooner
03 February 2016 18:50:34

Sunday through to next Friday looks as though not only will it feel cold but will actually be cold



 


 



 


Remember anything after T120 is really Just For Fun



Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L


Remove ads from site

Ads